▲ 714 ▼ it could happen to you rule (lemmy.cafe) submitted 2 years ago* by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone 143 comments fedilink hide all child comments see if your instance is one of them here: https://fedipact.veganism.social/
[–] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Wasn't federated, or was federated? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Neato@ttrpg.network 3 points 2 years ago (3 children) I've always got to invert the double negatives to parse crap like this: I probably would use an instance if it was federated to Threads. Not exactly the same meaning, but it gets you on the right side of the negatives. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] SwagGaribaldi@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Yup, that's what I meant, but like you said, it doesn't carry the exact same meaning if I wrote it like that permalink fedilink source parent [–] h14h@midwest.social 1 point 2 years ago Best way to address this is to reword a bit: I probably would not use avoid using an instance that wasn't federated to Threads Using "not" twice in a single sentence is generally something worth avoiding IMO. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 1 point 2 years ago I understood the meaning. I was clarifying the point OP was trying to make because I 100% disagree with it as worded. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 3 points 2 years ago (3 children) I've always got to invert the double negatives to parse crap like this: I probably would use an instance if it was federated to Threads. Not exactly the same meaning, but it gets you on the right side of the negatives. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] SwagGaribaldi@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Yup, that's what I meant, but like you said, it doesn't carry the exact same meaning if I wrote it like that permalink fedilink source parent [–] h14h@midwest.social 1 point 2 years ago Best way to address this is to reword a bit: I probably would not use avoid using an instance that wasn't federated to Threads Using "not" twice in a single sentence is generally something worth avoiding IMO. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 1 point 2 years ago I understood the meaning. I was clarifying the point OP was trying to make because I 100% disagree with it as worded. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SwagGaribaldi@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Yup, that's what I meant, but like you said, it doesn't carry the exact same meaning if I wrote it like that permalink fedilink source parent
[–] h14h@midwest.social 1 point 2 years ago Best way to address this is to reword a bit: I probably would not use avoid using an instance that wasn't federated to Threads Using "not" twice in a single sentence is generally something worth avoiding IMO. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 1 point 2 years ago I understood the meaning. I was clarifying the point OP was trying to make because I 100% disagree with it as worded. permalink fedilink source parent