▲ 2 ▼ First room temperature and pressure superconductor discovered (lemmy.world) submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) by DominicHillsun@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world 20 comments fedilink hide all child comments Research paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12008 Video: https://sciencecast.org/casts/suc384jly50n
[–] xkforce@lemmy.world -3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Publishing this outside of a reputable journal is definitely not how papers get peer reviewed. In fact, its a huge red flag. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rustydrd@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) This is a preprint published on arXiv.org, which is as reputable as it gets before peer review (so no red flag but standard practice). But I agree that people shouldn't place hopes in this before it's been peer reviewed and replicated by independent researchers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] xkforce@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago My comment was directed specifically at the parent's comment about publishing (in general not in a reputable peer reviewed journal which arxiv isnt) being how peer review happens. Arxiv is a preprint server. There is no peer review and while many of the papers there have survived the peer review process, a paper being on that server doesnt really say anything about the quality of that paper. It could be a great paper, it could be garbage or somewhere in between the two extremes. In any case, the hype around this paper is concerning because it has not, as of yet, survived the scrutiny that is demanded by the claims it is making. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rustydrd@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) This is a preprint published on arXiv.org, which is as reputable as it gets before peer review (so no red flag but standard practice). But I agree that people shouldn't place hopes in this before it's been peer reviewed and replicated by independent researchers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] xkforce@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago My comment was directed specifically at the parent's comment about publishing (in general not in a reputable peer reviewed journal which arxiv isnt) being how peer review happens. Arxiv is a preprint server. There is no peer review and while many of the papers there have survived the peer review process, a paper being on that server doesnt really say anything about the quality of that paper. It could be a great paper, it could be garbage or somewhere in between the two extremes. In any case, the hype around this paper is concerning because it has not, as of yet, survived the scrutiny that is demanded by the claims it is making. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] xkforce@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago My comment was directed specifically at the parent's comment about publishing (in general not in a reputable peer reviewed journal which arxiv isnt) being how peer review happens. Arxiv is a preprint server. There is no peer review and while many of the papers there have survived the peer review process, a paper being on that server doesnt really say anything about the quality of that paper. It could be a great paper, it could be garbage or somewhere in between the two extremes. In any case, the hype around this paper is concerning because it has not, as of yet, survived the scrutiny that is demanded by the claims it is making. permalink fedilink source parent
