you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 312 points 2 years ago (12 children)

This is Culver’s. They’re a burger fast food joint located throughout the Midwest and have things called “Scoopy Night” where a percentage of the proceeds go toward a specific cause. Schools, dance groups, etc can partake and the kids who attend that school/dance group/etc help take orders and deliver food to tables. Not quite as dystopian as OP has made it seem.

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 100 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Honestly... the idea that they do this work, and the money goes to a school instead of them, makes it even worse to me?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    It's a fundraiser likely for an after school program. It typically pays out a lot better than a car wash or brat fry. Typically the students run orders out to cars.

    And yeah, we probably should put more funding into schools for stuff like this instead of asking kids to fundraise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    "Child labor is ok if the money goes to a school!"

    • the user who wrote this comment
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago

    Yea it makes it worse tbh. We won't fund fun things at the schools so instead we make them work fast food to earn that funding.

    It is indeed even more dystopian when you put it like that. It's got the same energy as people giving their coworker PTO so they can deliver a baby or whatever.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 38 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Are the kids required to work in order to get the money? Because that sounds like a job with good PR.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That's just child labor exploitation with extra steps.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • This is what it is, and it's sad that it's so normalized that people are defending it.

    Everyone knows the kids aren't technically required, but they're "required" by social pressure.

    I remember having to go door to door selling things when I was a kid. It may have been voluntary in a technical sense, but I was pretty well mandated to do so if I wanted to be part of that group with my friends. And there was even more pressure from my mom and dad because they didn't want to be the family whose kid didn't do the thing.

    I think it's time we start taking a long hard look at some of these things like fundraisers and de facto coerced employment of youth (without pay) and ask ourselves if a healthy system would allow this.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    when we needed to do fundraisers THE PARENTS IN THE PTA DID IT FOR THE MIDDLE SCHOOLERS.

    We had plenty of 'kids' working at fast food and grocery stores but not until 15 minimum. this kid looks like he's 9. that's too young to be fucking around near fryers and hot grills.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    In this thread, a bunch of people that have never heard of doing a fundraiser.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Next up, they're going to go scream at the girl scouts on the corner that they're being exploited

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago

    The way this thread is going it sure would seem that way. A little bit of menial work to earn money for an activity is hardly the same as if this kid was on his 9-5 grind just itching for his next smoke break.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Whoa whoa whoa, how dare you provide context! I want to be rage baited into thinking America Bad!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Don't worry, there's plenty of legitimate outrage to be had without manufacturing it...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Why pay any attention to manufactured outrage? If there's actual events to be outraged about, then we should talk about them instead of fictions. If there's only manufactured events, then it isn't an issue in the first place.

    This is different from hypotheticals too. A realistic hypothetical holds as much water as an actual event. If there's a 1% chance of a catastrophic hypothetical, and it happens hundreds of times daily, that's a big fucking deal.

    To put it another way, if there's something to be legitimately outraged about, why bother with creating fictitious scenarios?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    No, that's still idiotic. It doesn't matter what the context is of why a child is working at a fast food restaurant. There's a child working at a fast food restaurant. This isn't selling chocolates to raise money for a class hamster.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Being intent on remaining outraged is idiotic. Spending a few hours doing a handful of minor tasks at a fast food restaurant for fun is worlds apart from being required to labor for day after day for a pay check.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago*

    Selling chocolates is so much worse though. That always creeped me out because it’s either A) kids learning how to hawk wares on the street outside of stores, B) kids learning how to be door-to-door cold call solicitors or C) run a MLM pyramid scheme by convincing their parents to push their product at work.

    Maybe even D) a combination of all of those for the ultimate street hustler training.

    This is just kids “playing house” for a few hours. Most probably love that shit. I would have killed to see what the buttons on the register do and how the fries are made.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

    It’s indicative of a larger effort by republicans to force children back to work, this is part of that dystopia even if it’s on the “light dystopia” side of the spectrum.

    Fuck off whiteknight, keep enabling corporate’s ability to normalize and capitalize off of child labor. This ain’t no goddamn bake sale or car wash.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/made-by-history/2023/04/18/child-labor-returns/

    https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-immigration-hyundai/

    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/25/us/unaccompanied-migrant-child-workers-exploitation.html

    Keep downvoting, bootlickers

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Work experience at school is legitimately a thing though here in the UK.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's is in the US too after age 15.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    scoopie night The abuse has to stop. Look at those abused kids. The horror.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Would you want your child working at a fast food restaurant? Doesn't matter what kind of cutesy name gets attached to child labor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago*

    For a few hours? Sure, why not. They’re not actually useful labor. The store is doing you a favor. Your average 8 year old peeled away from Minecraft and told to do a task is going to fuck up more than they help. I know, because I was that kid and I fucked up a lot. Sometimes in very expensive ways. My only worry would be that they would leave the job thinking every day will be fresh and new like that day, and that people are gracious and polite.

    For a few weeks? Oh hell yes, now we’re talking. Then they’ll see the monotony and how much corporate sucks. Even more, how much customers suck. At that point, the value of learning a skill that keeps you out of the fast food/retail mines will be obvious.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Depends on the kid. Do they treat workers disrespectfully, or not understand that money shouldn't be recklessly spent? Absolutely have them work fast food for a night -- so long as an adult is there to make sure there's no safety issues and they're paid full minimum wage for it, I'm all for it.

    I had a chemistry teacher in high school who maintained that everyone should have to work retail or fast food once, and as I've grown older I completely understand what they meant. Some people are naturally not dicks. They don't look down on workers at Walmart or McDonald's. For others, it's a lesson they have to learn. They need to work in that position to understand what it's like.

    That doesn't mean we should draft all kindergarteners into the work force. But the occasional experience to show them what a minimum wage job is like? Absolutely. If we want kids to grow up voting for minimum wage increases and universal labor rights, they have to learn these things somehow.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Yes, of course I would. It's a great experience. We actually did that back in school, had a week when we all went out to check out different jobs. It was a great thrill and fun for all. Certainly not labor. We got to do grownup things. That was shortly before seventh grade, iirc.

    And then, we've had school things where we would bake and cook and sell it right there on campus. Is that labor as well? Oh, and when I was in the boy scouts, we sometimes went door to door raising funds and selling trinkets. Child labor?

    It's not like we had to do eight-hour days, week for week. A few hours, once in your life. That's not labor. That's a fun thing to do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments