▲ 619 ▼ Prime location for development (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world 81 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sure, when zoning codes allow for them. So you know, essentially never. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) If they rezone a national park to residential it will definitely be highrise MDU. Edit more space efficient for the NIMGC tree huggers permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Why do you say that? We destroy plenty of nature and it almost always ends up single family home suburban sprawl. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Continuous grade of square footage is one factor, the suburb would have trouble with sprawl and boulder ingress permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yes, car centric suburbs have tons of problems but when has that ever stopped us? We build them in literal flood plains, and along cramped mudslide prone mountains. I’ve never heard of an empty piece of land in the middle of nowhere being zoned for high density residential in the US. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago I figured the sides of the canyon would get in the way of profitability permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) If they rezone a national park to residential it will definitely be highrise MDU. Edit more space efficient for the NIMGC tree huggers permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Why do you say that? We destroy plenty of nature and it almost always ends up single family home suburban sprawl. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Continuous grade of square footage is one factor, the suburb would have trouble with sprawl and boulder ingress permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yes, car centric suburbs have tons of problems but when has that ever stopped us? We build them in literal flood plains, and along cramped mudslide prone mountains. I’ve never heard of an empty piece of land in the middle of nowhere being zoned for high density residential in the US. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago I figured the sides of the canyon would get in the way of profitability permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Why do you say that? We destroy plenty of nature and it almost always ends up single family home suburban sprawl. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Continuous grade of square footage is one factor, the suburb would have trouble with sprawl and boulder ingress permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yes, car centric suburbs have tons of problems but when has that ever stopped us? We build them in literal flood plains, and along cramped mudslide prone mountains. I’ve never heard of an empty piece of land in the middle of nowhere being zoned for high density residential in the US. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago I figured the sides of the canyon would get in the way of profitability permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Continuous grade of square footage is one factor, the suburb would have trouble with sprawl and boulder ingress permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yes, car centric suburbs have tons of problems but when has that ever stopped us? We build them in literal flood plains, and along cramped mudslide prone mountains. I’ve never heard of an empty piece of land in the middle of nowhere being zoned for high density residential in the US. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago I figured the sides of the canyon would get in the way of profitability permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yes, car centric suburbs have tons of problems but when has that ever stopped us? We build them in literal flood plains, and along cramped mudslide prone mountains. I’ve never heard of an empty piece of land in the middle of nowhere being zoned for high density residential in the US. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago I figured the sides of the canyon would get in the way of profitability permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago I figured the sides of the canyon would get in the way of profitability permalink fedilink source parent
