you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    I strongly believe that the US Native rule is imperative to US Sovereignty so I would never agree to revoking it. You want to lead the country, you have to have a life long investment it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    I am honestly neutral on this subject. I don't think it would affect my vote, but the constitution says that you have to be native born, so that's kind of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Same. It'll maybe exclude some people with just as much investment in America as a native born citizen, but we're a country of 300M+, we shouldn't have trouble finding scores of equally talented candidates. And yet we're getting a rematch of two extremely old men who are both disliked by most Americans. Our problem isn't the presidential qualification requirements.

  • source
  • parent