▲ 263 ▼ 'Suits' Was Streamed For 3 Billion Minutes on Netflix and the Writers Were Collectively Paid $3,000 (nofilmschool.com) submitted 3 years ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/workreform@lemmy.world 13 comments fedilink hide all child comments The sorry state of streaming residuals shows why SAG and the WGA are striking.
[+] 47_alpha_tango@lemmy.zip -6 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [+] Puzzle_Sluts_4Ever@lemmy.world 25 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent [–] DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world 23 points 3 years ago (2 children) Daily Mail isn't journalism. They're complete trash. Trust them like you would a used car sales in man in a cheap suit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] billbasher@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) Furthering your point permalink fedilink source parent [–] 2piradians@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago For me it's any salesman wearing whatever. permalink fedilink source parent [–] druidgreeneyes@discuss.online 7 points 3 years ago I’m taking that one with a grain of salt; it’s coming from the mouth of one ceo, with little to no apparent fact-checking, through a paper that has been widely criticized for sensationalism and unreliability in its reporting. source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Mail permalink fedilink source parent [–] grte@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 years ago* You can't take the company at their word on that. They're in the middle of a labour action, of course they're not going to go on about how much effect the strike is having on them, that's counter to the goals of starving the other side out. And anyways, this is saving money in the sense that burning down one's house will save money on rent. permalink fedilink source parent [–] just_change_it@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago If people aren't doing work you aren't paying them wages. So yes, sure, some company probably saved 100m in wages, benefits, etc. This is what they call bottom line savings. What i'd like to hear is how this affects their top line e.g. revenue. Only the combination matters and odds are this will have impacts on the top line in the next 18-36 months. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Puzzle_Sluts_4Ever@lemmy.world 25 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world 23 points 3 years ago (2 children) Daily Mail isn't journalism. They're complete trash. Trust them like you would a used car sales in man in a cheap suit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] billbasher@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) Furthering your point permalink fedilink source parent [–] 2piradians@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago For me it's any salesman wearing whatever. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] billbasher@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) Furthering your point permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 2piradians@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago For me it's any salesman wearing whatever. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] druidgreeneyes@discuss.online 7 points 3 years ago I’m taking that one with a grain of salt; it’s coming from the mouth of one ceo, with little to no apparent fact-checking, through a paper that has been widely criticized for sensationalism and unreliability in its reporting. source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Mail permalink fedilink source parent
[–] grte@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 years ago* You can't take the company at their word on that. They're in the middle of a labour action, of course they're not going to go on about how much effect the strike is having on them, that's counter to the goals of starving the other side out. And anyways, this is saving money in the sense that burning down one's house will save money on rent. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] just_change_it@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago If people aren't doing work you aren't paying them wages. So yes, sure, some company probably saved 100m in wages, benefits, etc. This is what they call bottom line savings. What i'd like to hear is how this affects their top line e.g. revenue. Only the combination matters and odds are this will have impacts on the top line in the next 18-36 months. permalink fedilink source parent