you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

That's not speech. You can age limit things, but not on speech. Beyond that, the limitations on speech have to meet certain conditions where it's in the publics best interest and doesn't put too much burden on the public.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    Restricting access to explicit material is the same as restricting alcohol or tobacco.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    Tobacco is not speech.

    Edit: plus one is an economic regulation .The other is not. Like, you can smoke tobacco at really any age. Just can buy it at any age.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    You're still ignoring my first point which is the much more important distinction. It's not speech.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    It’s not a free speech issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    The literal lawsuit says otherwise. It's the first claim they wrote.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments