you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -63 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)
  • [–] 40 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Condemning organizations which support hate speech and eroding of civil rights is too 'political', we better just not talk about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -40 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [+] -34 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    We found the perfect loophole guys! Instead of the company itself funding hatred and trying to get rid of equal rights we'll just have the owner, the one who profits from the company do it himself! Genius! The company is family owned. If you eat there you are directly funding these sociopathic billionaires.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -32 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This logic only works if you pretend that there aren't other nearby restaurants needing service workers if business slows down at bigot chicken.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Nooooooo! If they haven't personally wronged you then you're just woke antifa that doesn't deserve good Jesus chicken. These fuckin people, man. The common thread is that they don't give a fuck about anybody else

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It’s chicken. It isn’t political

    THE COMPANY MADE IT POLITICAL. Is it easier to understand who brought politics into the dinner conversation if it's in larger letters?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -41 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    While the product, being inanimate isn't involved in the decision. You are just making excuses.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It sounds like you are making excuses for "right to work" corpos owning their workers. Wage slaves are wage slaves and the further we remove the predatory practices the better. It is funny you want to seem holier than ### thou when you are really nothing but another clueless libertarian.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Why are you arguing when you know you don't know what they're talking about, and a quick Google search can verify what they're saying? Or are you just playing stupid?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Well, I can see that someone who moves the goalposts this often isn't worth arguing with. Maybe just state the point you really want to make the first time instead of being sheepish about it?

    Also, "slacktivism"? Man, I can't take you seriously. How hilarious would it be though— you're so quick to assume people don't do anything but argue on the internet, someone's gonna show you up someday. You honestly sound a whole lot like you're projecting about "slacktivism". But oh well, onto reading the next Lemmy post.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments