▲ 287 ▼ EDIT: I THINK I STAND CORRECTED (lemmy.zip) submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by balderdash9@lemmy.zip to c/memes@lemmy.world 218 comments fedilink hide all child comments I considered deleting the post, but this seems more cowardly than just admitting I was wrong. But TIL something!
[–] leave_it_blank@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yes, the amount of both stacks is infinity. The question was not "What stack is easier to pay for something with". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] olafurp@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Both are equally easy to pay with since ∞ - X = ∞ if we disregard that 100s are more convenient way to pay for cars. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] EmergMemeHologram@startrek.website 1 point 2 years ago I bet you’ll get more questions buying a car with 100s than if you bought it with singles. In Canada the $100 would be more convenient because we only gave $1 in coin form, which would be hella annoying to lug around. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Both are equally easy to pay with since ∞ - X = ∞ if we disregard that 100s are more convenient way to pay for cars. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] EmergMemeHologram@startrek.website 1 point 2 years ago I bet you’ll get more questions buying a car with 100s than if you bought it with singles. In Canada the $100 would be more convenient because we only gave $1 in coin form, which would be hella annoying to lug around. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] EmergMemeHologram@startrek.website 1 point 2 years ago I bet you’ll get more questions buying a car with 100s than if you bought it with singles. In Canada the $100 would be more convenient because we only gave $1 in coin form, which would be hella annoying to lug around. permalink fedilink source parent
