635
Tesla Cybertruck gets less than 80% of advertised range in YouTuber’s test (nypost.com)
submitted 2 years ago by [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world
152 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Tesla Cybertruck gets less than 80% of advertised range in YouTuber’s test::A YouTuber took Tesla’s Cybertruck on a ride to see if it can actually hit its advertised 320-mile range, only to find out that its could only reach 79% of the target. When YouTuber Kyle Conn…

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Notice how I mentioned model 3 and y, which are the ones selling millions, not musk's ego trip cybertruck?

Promises are nice, let's see the model interiors in a few years.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Lets see if there is a tesla in a few years once the class actions drop over the false promises they made

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    They were careful enough to never promise anything in contracts, just on Twitter or TV interviews. The WLTP ratings are done by external testers, I imagine the EPA ratings are similar. They will settle out of court maybe for misleading advertising for somethimg, owners will get a check in the mail for 40 cents and that will be it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    They literally faked FSD mate...

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    In Twitter comments

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    In the literal launch video of it, lol, maybe take out elons cock form your mouth so you can breathe some oxygen and look around

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    So edgy, so smart. Never mind I said "Twitter and TV interviews - not in written contracts".

    So thanks for proving me right, edge lord.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    since when do you need a contract for false advertising claims you donut

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    A TV interview or a Twitter rant is not the kind of advertising you can sue for, your honor.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    how about the official video on the Tesla website that's used to promote FSD? maybe if you stopped licking elon's boots you'd have time to inform yourself...

    https://www.reuters.com/technology/tesla-video-promoting-self-driving-was-staged-engineer-testifies-2023-01-17/

    ...

    https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2023-12-11/tesla-dmv-false-advertising-charges

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •