▲ 584 ▼ IDF Soldier Recounts Harrowing, Heroic War Story Of Killing 8-Month-Old Child (www.theonion.com) submitted 2 years ago by can@sh.itjust.works to c/theonion@midwest.social 32 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world -51 points 2 years ago (4 children) This just makes me sad, 1/10, not a funny oniony story. permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] derphurr@lemmy.world 52 points 2 years ago (2 children) Because it isn't satire. Adam Samer al-Ghoul, 8, was shot in the head and Basil Suleiman Abu al-Wafa, 15, died after he was shot in the chest. And this is in refugee camps in the West Bank, not the main action in Gaza. At least 242 Palestinians, including more than 50 children, have been killed in the occupied West Bank since October 7. More than 2,750 have been injured. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (2 children) It was when the article was written. In 2018. No one online does even basic research anymore, like even clicking the link. Everyone just reads the headline and makes assumptions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] chocolateo@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah guys be sure to read the whole The Onion article, not just the headlines, if you want to stay informed permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) The poster I responded to was clearly taking the article at face value, even ignoring the satirical nature, it's a 5 year old article either way and not written about current events. A post trying to conflate a 5 year old satire article and current events is factually wrong and should be called out, even if the source is obviously satire. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doorbook@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I would disagree because it proves the fact that these actions we see today is in align with historical trends. permalink fedilink source parent [+] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world -31 points 2 years ago (4 children) Yes, but it's not funny now, so why is someone posting it? It's incredibly poor taste . permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] DashboTreeFrog@discuss.online 36 points 2 years ago Gallows humor. It's sad that the general events are real but the mocking way the article and headline are written allows the reader to chuckle through the horror. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 11181514@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago How is it in poor taste? Just because it's real? The faux empathy for the IDF is literally the joke. It's saying "killing babies bad". What part of that do you have an issue with? permalink fedilink source parent [–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yes but something happened after this article was written, why haven't the time lords gone back and unmade the article so I don't have to feel uncomfortable about the fact that this has all been going on for a long time and the world has been silent about it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] can@sh.itjust.works [S] 3 points 2 years ago They tried permalink fedilink source parent [–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* It’s not meant to be funny. It’s meant to be shocking and lead your outrage in a quest to disprove the core tenet, only to be forced to confront the awful element/actual reality the article was satirizing. The “oooof that’s hits close to home” reaction is the entire point permalink fedilink source parent [–] rainerloeten@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Sauce pls permalink fedilink source parent [–] can@sh.itjust.works [S] 29 points 2 years ago Saddest thing is it's from 2018 permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheCrispyDud@kbin.social 22 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sometimes The Onion needs to make you cry to remind you what it really is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Heir_Of_Isildur@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago The onion writers are so goddamn good permalink fedilink source parent [+] Woht24@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] derphurr@lemmy.world 52 points 2 years ago (2 children) Because it isn't satire. Adam Samer al-Ghoul, 8, was shot in the head and Basil Suleiman Abu al-Wafa, 15, died after he was shot in the chest. And this is in refugee camps in the West Bank, not the main action in Gaza. At least 242 Palestinians, including more than 50 children, have been killed in the occupied West Bank since October 7. More than 2,750 have been injured. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (2 children) It was when the article was written. In 2018. No one online does even basic research anymore, like even clicking the link. Everyone just reads the headline and makes assumptions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] chocolateo@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah guys be sure to read the whole The Onion article, not just the headlines, if you want to stay informed permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) The poster I responded to was clearly taking the article at face value, even ignoring the satirical nature, it's a 5 year old article either way and not written about current events. A post trying to conflate a 5 year old satire article and current events is factually wrong and should be called out, even if the source is obviously satire. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doorbook@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I would disagree because it proves the fact that these actions we see today is in align with historical trends. permalink fedilink source parent [+] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world -31 points 2 years ago (4 children) Yes, but it's not funny now, so why is someone posting it? It's incredibly poor taste . permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] DashboTreeFrog@discuss.online 36 points 2 years ago Gallows humor. It's sad that the general events are real but the mocking way the article and headline are written allows the reader to chuckle through the horror. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 11181514@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago How is it in poor taste? Just because it's real? The faux empathy for the IDF is literally the joke. It's saying "killing babies bad". What part of that do you have an issue with? permalink fedilink source parent [–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yes but something happened after this article was written, why haven't the time lords gone back and unmade the article so I don't have to feel uncomfortable about the fact that this has all been going on for a long time and the world has been silent about it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] can@sh.itjust.works [S] 3 points 2 years ago They tried permalink fedilink source parent [–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* It’s not meant to be funny. It’s meant to be shocking and lead your outrage in a quest to disprove the core tenet, only to be forced to confront the awful element/actual reality the article was satirizing. The “oooof that’s hits close to home” reaction is the entire point permalink fedilink source parent [–] rainerloeten@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Sauce pls permalink fedilink source parent
[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (2 children) It was when the article was written. In 2018. No one online does even basic research anymore, like even clicking the link. Everyone just reads the headline and makes assumptions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] chocolateo@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah guys be sure to read the whole The Onion article, not just the headlines, if you want to stay informed permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) The poster I responded to was clearly taking the article at face value, even ignoring the satirical nature, it's a 5 year old article either way and not written about current events. A post trying to conflate a 5 year old satire article and current events is factually wrong and should be called out, even if the source is obviously satire. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doorbook@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I would disagree because it proves the fact that these actions we see today is in align with historical trends. permalink fedilink source parent [+] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world -31 points 2 years ago (4 children) Yes, but it's not funny now, so why is someone posting it? It's incredibly poor taste . permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] DashboTreeFrog@discuss.online 36 points 2 years ago Gallows humor. It's sad that the general events are real but the mocking way the article and headline are written allows the reader to chuckle through the horror. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 11181514@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago How is it in poor taste? Just because it's real? The faux empathy for the IDF is literally the joke. It's saying "killing babies bad". What part of that do you have an issue with? permalink fedilink source parent [–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yes but something happened after this article was written, why haven't the time lords gone back and unmade the article so I don't have to feel uncomfortable about the fact that this has all been going on for a long time and the world has been silent about it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] can@sh.itjust.works [S] 3 points 2 years ago They tried permalink fedilink source parent [–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* It’s not meant to be funny. It’s meant to be shocking and lead your outrage in a quest to disprove the core tenet, only to be forced to confront the awful element/actual reality the article was satirizing. The “oooof that’s hits close to home” reaction is the entire point permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chocolateo@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah guys be sure to read the whole The Onion article, not just the headlines, if you want to stay informed permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) The poster I responded to was clearly taking the article at face value, even ignoring the satirical nature, it's a 5 year old article either way and not written about current events. A post trying to conflate a 5 year old satire article and current events is factually wrong and should be called out, even if the source is obviously satire. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doorbook@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I would disagree because it proves the fact that these actions we see today is in align with historical trends. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) The poster I responded to was clearly taking the article at face value, even ignoring the satirical nature, it's a 5 year old article either way and not written about current events. A post trying to conflate a 5 year old satire article and current events is factually wrong and should be called out, even if the source is obviously satire. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doorbook@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I would disagree because it proves the fact that these actions we see today is in align with historical trends. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Doorbook@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I would disagree because it proves the fact that these actions we see today is in align with historical trends. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world -31 points 2 years ago (4 children) Yes, but it's not funny now, so why is someone posting it? It's incredibly poor taste . permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] DashboTreeFrog@discuss.online 36 points 2 years ago Gallows humor. It's sad that the general events are real but the mocking way the article and headline are written allows the reader to chuckle through the horror. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 11181514@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago How is it in poor taste? Just because it's real? The faux empathy for the IDF is literally the joke. It's saying "killing babies bad". What part of that do you have an issue with? permalink fedilink source parent [–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yes but something happened after this article was written, why haven't the time lords gone back and unmade the article so I don't have to feel uncomfortable about the fact that this has all been going on for a long time and the world has been silent about it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] can@sh.itjust.works [S] 3 points 2 years ago They tried permalink fedilink source parent [–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* It’s not meant to be funny. It’s meant to be shocking and lead your outrage in a quest to disprove the core tenet, only to be forced to confront the awful element/actual reality the article was satirizing. The “oooof that’s hits close to home” reaction is the entire point permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DashboTreeFrog@discuss.online 36 points 2 years ago Gallows humor. It's sad that the general events are real but the mocking way the article and headline are written allows the reader to chuckle through the horror. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 11181514@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago How is it in poor taste? Just because it's real? The faux empathy for the IDF is literally the joke. It's saying "killing babies bad". What part of that do you have an issue with? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yes but something happened after this article was written, why haven't the time lords gone back and unmade the article so I don't have to feel uncomfortable about the fact that this has all been going on for a long time and the world has been silent about it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] can@sh.itjust.works [S] 3 points 2 years ago They tried permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* It’s not meant to be funny. It’s meant to be shocking and lead your outrage in a quest to disprove the core tenet, only to be forced to confront the awful element/actual reality the article was satirizing. The “oooof that’s hits close to home” reaction is the entire point permalink fedilink source parent
[–] can@sh.itjust.works [S] 29 points 2 years ago Saddest thing is it's from 2018 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheCrispyDud@kbin.social 22 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sometimes The Onion needs to make you cry to remind you what it really is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Heir_Of_Isildur@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago The onion writers are so goddamn good permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Heir_Of_Isildur@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago The onion writers are so goddamn good permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Woht24@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent