you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 86 points 3 years ago (2 children)

I am pretty sure these laws have nothing to do with "protecting children"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    It's the same rhetoric that the UK government are using to get a backdoor on messaging apps with E2EE.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    The UK is trying to get the age verification for porn thing going as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    They've been trying for years and never get anywhere.

    They face an issue that introducing age verification requires an ID system and whilst age verification polls well (as did earlier silly ideas like a watershed for the internet . Unfortunately, timezones exist..) ID verification polls extremely badly

    So I suspect trying and failing is their holding position where they satisfy both.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    Yeah, anytime you see somebody making the "think of the children!" argument, look at what the possible end goal could be with that removed. Protecting kids is a favorite smokescreen because kids can't speak up for themselves in these cases.

  • source
  • parent