▲ 211 ▼ [Answered] Why is the consumption of Meat considered bad (lemmy.world) submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) by Skyraptor7@lemmy.world to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world 305 comments fedilink hide all child comments I heard something to do with Nitrogen and …cow farts(?) I am really unsure of this and would like to learn more. Answer - 4 Parts Ethical reason for consuming animals Methane produced by cows are a harmful greenhouse gas which is contributing to our current climate crisis Health Reasons - there is convincing evidence that processed meats cause cancer it takes a lot more calories of plant food to produce the calories we would consume from the meat. Details about the answers are in the comments
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) people need more than nutrients, and of course people don't like harming animals, but eating meat doesn't do that: the animal is already dead. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] max@feddit.nl 2 points 3 years ago (2 children) Sure, people need good tasting food, too. That’s no issue. As for the already dead animals not having been harmed: Wut? They don’t exactly ask a cow nicely if it could just die for a steak. It needs to be killed. Often in a not too humane manner. Before that, it’s likely that the cow has suffered during transport or when it was forced to birth calves year in, year out, so it could keep producing milk. All those things harm the animal in one way or another, so yes, eating meat does cause harm. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) eating a steak does not cause the cow to have been killed, since an event in the future cannot cause an event in the past. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] max@feddit.nl 2 points 3 years ago* (1 child) since an event in the future cannot cause an event in the past Agreed. But let's be honest here. If there was no demand for meat, animals would not be killed for meat. So your choice of whether to buy (and eat) meat or not does very much have impact permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) If there was no demand for meat, animals would not be killed for meat. how can you prove that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] max@feddit.nl 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Supply and demand. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 years ago That's not a magic phrase that makes what you said true. it's a theory about price discovery. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) it's not strictly about taste. people need community and esteem and self-actualization, too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] max@feddit.nl 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) What do those things have to do with choosing what to eat? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) what if, to self actualize, i need to master french cuisine? or what if to stay in community, i need to go to a barbecue or thanksgiving dinner? what if, for esteem, i need the convenience of grabbing a mindless quick meal between my duties? you don't know what anyone needs. many people may need to eat meat, and nutrition has little or nothing to do with it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] max@feddit.nl 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) It's all a personal choice. There's no one holding a gun to your head forcing you to use/consume meat. It's fine that it's a personal choice, but it is something one should be aware of. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 years ago it's awfully patronizing for you to decide for other people what they need. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] max@feddit.nl 2 points 3 years ago (2 children) Sure, people need good tasting food, too. That’s no issue. As for the already dead animals not having been harmed: Wut? They don’t exactly ask a cow nicely if it could just die for a steak. It needs to be killed. Often in a not too humane manner. Before that, it’s likely that the cow has suffered during transport or when it was forced to birth calves year in, year out, so it could keep producing milk. All those things harm the animal in one way or another, so yes, eating meat does cause harm. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) eating a steak does not cause the cow to have been killed, since an event in the future cannot cause an event in the past. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] max@feddit.nl 2 points 3 years ago* (1 child) since an event in the future cannot cause an event in the past Agreed. But let's be honest here. If there was no demand for meat, animals would not be killed for meat. So your choice of whether to buy (and eat) meat or not does very much have impact permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) If there was no demand for meat, animals would not be killed for meat. how can you prove that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] max@feddit.nl 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Supply and demand. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 years ago That's not a magic phrase that makes what you said true. it's a theory about price discovery. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) it's not strictly about taste. people need community and esteem and self-actualization, too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] max@feddit.nl 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) What do those things have to do with choosing what to eat? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) what if, to self actualize, i need to master french cuisine? or what if to stay in community, i need to go to a barbecue or thanksgiving dinner? what if, for esteem, i need the convenience of grabbing a mindless quick meal between my duties? you don't know what anyone needs. many people may need to eat meat, and nutrition has little or nothing to do with it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] max@feddit.nl 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) It's all a personal choice. There's no one holding a gun to your head forcing you to use/consume meat. It's fine that it's a personal choice, but it is something one should be aware of. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 years ago it's awfully patronizing for you to decide for other people what they need. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) eating a steak does not cause the cow to have been killed, since an event in the future cannot cause an event in the past. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] max@feddit.nl 2 points 3 years ago* (1 child) since an event in the future cannot cause an event in the past Agreed. But let's be honest here. If there was no demand for meat, animals would not be killed for meat. So your choice of whether to buy (and eat) meat or not does very much have impact permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) If there was no demand for meat, animals would not be killed for meat. how can you prove that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] max@feddit.nl 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Supply and demand. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 years ago That's not a magic phrase that makes what you said true. it's a theory about price discovery. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] max@feddit.nl 2 points 3 years ago* (1 child) since an event in the future cannot cause an event in the past Agreed. But let's be honest here. If there was no demand for meat, animals would not be killed for meat. So your choice of whether to buy (and eat) meat or not does very much have impact permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) If there was no demand for meat, animals would not be killed for meat. how can you prove that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] max@feddit.nl 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Supply and demand. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 years ago That's not a magic phrase that makes what you said true. it's a theory about price discovery. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) If there was no demand for meat, animals would not be killed for meat. how can you prove that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] max@feddit.nl 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Supply and demand. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 years ago That's not a magic phrase that makes what you said true. it's a theory about price discovery. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] max@feddit.nl 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Supply and demand. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 years ago That's not a magic phrase that makes what you said true. it's a theory about price discovery. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 years ago That's not a magic phrase that makes what you said true. it's a theory about price discovery. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) it's not strictly about taste. people need community and esteem and self-actualization, too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] max@feddit.nl 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) What do those things have to do with choosing what to eat? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) what if, to self actualize, i need to master french cuisine? or what if to stay in community, i need to go to a barbecue or thanksgiving dinner? what if, for esteem, i need the convenience of grabbing a mindless quick meal between my duties? you don't know what anyone needs. many people may need to eat meat, and nutrition has little or nothing to do with it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] max@feddit.nl 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) It's all a personal choice. There's no one holding a gun to your head forcing you to use/consume meat. It's fine that it's a personal choice, but it is something one should be aware of. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 years ago it's awfully patronizing for you to decide for other people what they need. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] max@feddit.nl 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) What do those things have to do with choosing what to eat? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) what if, to self actualize, i need to master french cuisine? or what if to stay in community, i need to go to a barbecue or thanksgiving dinner? what if, for esteem, i need the convenience of grabbing a mindless quick meal between my duties? you don't know what anyone needs. many people may need to eat meat, and nutrition has little or nothing to do with it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] max@feddit.nl 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) It's all a personal choice. There's no one holding a gun to your head forcing you to use/consume meat. It's fine that it's a personal choice, but it is something one should be aware of. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 years ago it's awfully patronizing for you to decide for other people what they need. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) what if, to self actualize, i need to master french cuisine? or what if to stay in community, i need to go to a barbecue or thanksgiving dinner? what if, for esteem, i need the convenience of grabbing a mindless quick meal between my duties? you don't know what anyone needs. many people may need to eat meat, and nutrition has little or nothing to do with it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] max@feddit.nl 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) It's all a personal choice. There's no one holding a gun to your head forcing you to use/consume meat. It's fine that it's a personal choice, but it is something one should be aware of. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 years ago it's awfully patronizing for you to decide for other people what they need. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] max@feddit.nl 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) It's all a personal choice. There's no one holding a gun to your head forcing you to use/consume meat. It's fine that it's a personal choice, but it is something one should be aware of. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 years ago it's awfully patronizing for you to decide for other people what they need. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 years ago it's awfully patronizing for you to decide for other people what they need. permalink fedilink source parent