you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -88 points 2 years ago (6 children)
  • [–] 58 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The evidence of religion ruling people's lives is right in front of you and you act like we are drawing conclusions from nothing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -74 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    hur dur religion bad

    read a book

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    As long as its not a fucking religious text.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -32 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Religion can be toxic, but so can non-religious nations like Russia under Putin.

    The real shit is money and power - those are what kill and lie and steal from the billions of us who haven't yet got to the point of revolution.

    If nothing else we know it's coming ... and when it does it'll be massive and worldwide.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago

    Putin embraces the Russian Orthodox Church as part of his nationalism. Also, Russia is only 13% atheist. Hardly a non-religious nation.

    But, you're right, power is the real point. Religion is just one of the most hateful methods of justifying and maintaining power.

    Democracy with socially regulated capitalism, in our experience, has a lighter touch and has thus far provided a lot of benefits to the vast majority of people.

    You mention revolution, but don't specify from what or to what? Revolutions have a way of not going quite the way the idealists hope they will.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    So, you’re close but wrong country. Russia tried to get rid of religion but failed. The Russian Orthodox Church just kind of became part of the government. That’s why you see the priests blessing Russian weapons and stuff.

    China on the other hand did get rid of religion pretty successfully. The reason communism strives to get rid of religion is because when people aren’t arguing over who’s imaginary supernatural friend loves his people more. It’s easier to get them to agree on things.

    Now, I’m not going to pretend that this is a perfect plan. After all successfully getting rid of religion comes with a whole new set of pitfalls. But, I personally think the pros outweigh the cons.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Religion can be toxic, but so can non-religious nations like Russia under Putin.

    You can die from snake venom. That doesn't mean cancer is harmless.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago*

    I get what previous commenter said: the problem is the people with power wanting to control the population, religion is just the means to an end (sorry if this is not the correct way to say it). In my way of seeing it, religion as always been a cover to interests of the powerful, a way to keep the population controlled, or dumbed down. In the example of this thread, they are openly using this strategy by cutting access to education.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Bad people do bad things.

    But for a good person to do bad things, that takes religion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    But for a good person to do bad things, that takes religion.

    This sounds like it's a prerequisite to be good before becoming religious ... which historically is not the case.

    Child molesters who entered the priesthood were not "good" before using the shelter of the Church to rape children.

    Being "good" or "bad" is a conscious, moral decision which is maintained by every person choosing what is of the utmost importance for their life ... selfish fulfillment or altruism.

    ... this is, ofc, setting aside mental health issues that do not allow some to make rational conscious decisions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    This sounds like it’s a prerequisite to be good before becoming religious … which historically is not the case.

    No, it's saying if you are good, religion can make you do bad and that bad people will do bad regardless of religion.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago

    read a book

    Bible, Koran, Torah, Book of Mormon, The Vedas... you know there’s actually a lot of objectionable shit in all of these.

    I wonder if you meant some other books that support your ideals, jokes on me for reading the source materials instead I suppose.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Religions are as dumb as the people who believe them?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    Religions can be harmful for certain dumb people who believe them. It’s not a given, but with the interconnectivity of today these dumb people can organize and create echo chambers, and be much more harmful to both themselves and others. A stark, anti-religion stance seems harsh, but it’s likely the most effective way to avoid these pitfalls.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago*

    I would not say religions are bad when people consider real life more important. However, any form of religious radicalism is terrible and also when religion is combined with politics.

    There is nothing bad about following some religious tradition (such as all saints day or christmas) but pls don't take religion too seriously. Edit: corrections

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    casually thinks back ONLY these last five years

    remembers all the excuses and acts committed whilst hiding behind religion

    suddenly falls into a wormhole and lands in 1095

    I dunno, seems fishy.

  • source
  • parent