▲ 174 ▼ The Atlantic: Nobody Knows What’s Happening Online Anymore. Why you’ve probably never heard of the most popular Netflix show in the world. (archive.ph) submitted 2 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world 55 comments fedilink hide all child comments The Atlantic: Nobody Knows What’s Happening Online Anymore. Why you’ve probably never heard of the most popular Netflix show in the world.::undefined
[+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] drphungky@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) I can't remember what channel, but somebody did an experiment with not doing the ridiculous thumbnails and got way fewer views. Which sort of gets at the point of this article: the are huge swaths of people that are clicking on them and that sounds super foreign to a lot of us. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] treadful@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) By what mechanism? Manual curation? Do you have any idea how much content is on that platform? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] treadful@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) waves hands magic permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) That seems to be the only kind of trash content that Google is interested in pushing these days. Youtube "pushes" whatever gets more views and longer watch time. If trashy crap is being suggested, that means other people are watching it in increased numbers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Youtube "pushes" whatever gets more views and longer watch time. No YouTube pushes what people will click on. That's pretty much what I said. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Syntha@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Google pushes what you click. Stop watching this kind of content and it'll probably stop being recommended to you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] foxbat@lemmings.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) they are not optimizing for your enjoyment, they''re optimizing for your engagement. they don't give a fuck if you hate what you're watching as long as you watch it for longer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Syntha@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 years ago Well I practically never see these kinds of thumbnails, it's absolutely influenced by your behaviour whatever it may be. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] drphungky@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) I can't remember what channel, but somebody did an experiment with not doing the ridiculous thumbnails and got way fewer views. Which sort of gets at the point of this article: the are huge swaths of people that are clicking on them and that sounds super foreign to a lot of us. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] treadful@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) By what mechanism? Manual curation? Do you have any idea how much content is on that platform? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] treadful@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) waves hands magic permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] treadful@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) By what mechanism? Manual curation? Do you have any idea how much content is on that platform? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] treadful@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) waves hands magic permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) By what mechanism? Manual curation? Do you have any idea how much content is on that platform? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] treadful@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) waves hands magic permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] treadful@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) waves hands magic permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) waves hands magic permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) That seems to be the only kind of trash content that Google is interested in pushing these days. Youtube "pushes" whatever gets more views and longer watch time. If trashy crap is being suggested, that means other people are watching it in increased numbers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Youtube "pushes" whatever gets more views and longer watch time. No YouTube pushes what people will click on. That's pretty much what I said. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Youtube "pushes" whatever gets more views and longer watch time. No YouTube pushes what people will click on. That's pretty much what I said. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Youtube "pushes" whatever gets more views and longer watch time. No YouTube pushes what people will click on. That's pretty much what I said. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Syntha@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Google pushes what you click. Stop watching this kind of content and it'll probably stop being recommended to you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] foxbat@lemmings.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) they are not optimizing for your enjoyment, they''re optimizing for your engagement. they don't give a fuck if you hate what you're watching as long as you watch it for longer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Syntha@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 years ago Well I practically never see these kinds of thumbnails, it's absolutely influenced by your behaviour whatever it may be. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] foxbat@lemmings.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) they are not optimizing for your enjoyment, they''re optimizing for your engagement. they don't give a fuck if you hate what you're watching as long as you watch it for longer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Syntha@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 years ago Well I practically never see these kinds of thumbnails, it's absolutely influenced by your behaviour whatever it may be. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] foxbat@lemmings.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) they are not optimizing for your enjoyment, they''re optimizing for your engagement. they don't give a fuck if you hate what you're watching as long as you watch it for longer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Syntha@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 years ago Well I practically never see these kinds of thumbnails, it's absolutely influenced by your behaviour whatever it may be. permalink fedilink source parent