If 100 homeless people were given $750 per month for a year, no questions asked, what would they spend it on?

That question was at the core of a controlled study conducted by a San Francisco-based nonprofit and the USC Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work.

The results were so promising that the researchers decided to publish results after only six months. The answer: food, 36.6%; housing, 19.5%; transportation, 12.7%; clothing, 11.5%; and healthcare, 6.2%, leaving only 13.6% uncategorized.

Those who got the stipend were less likely to be unsheltered after six months and able to meet more of their basic needs than a control group that got no money, and half as likely as the control group to have an episode of being unsheltered.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20231221131158/https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2023-12-19/750-a-month-no-questions-asked-improved-the-lives-of-homeless-people

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

I think you should reread this thread.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    I think you're neither serious nor sincere about making UBI work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Obviously because of your "reread the thread" comment.

    That's not the response of someone who wants a meaningful discussion. That's the response of someone who wants to end the discussion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago*

    It's the response of a person who thinks you're having a conversation with someone else that you think you're having with me, based on the not-quite-on-topic nature of your posting.

    For instance, my first sentence in this entire comment section is

    We’re honestly not at a point where UBI is sustainable.

  • source
  • parent