108
Dancers at Los Angeles bar to become only unionized strippers in US after 15-month battle (apnews.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/unions@sh.itjust.works
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Apparently, I've been under a rock as today's thread from Cory Doctrow - @pluralistic@mamot.fr is the first I had heard of this.

Where I live such entertainers are considered independent contractors (1099) and as such it is ILLEGAL for them to unionize. Is there something different in California that qualifies them as employees (W2)?

If not, how did they get around the capitalist governments' rules?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 years ago

I think the idea is that its harder (hence limit) but not outright illegal, hence how voice actors do have a union, despite being independent contractors.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent