23
Firefox has surpassed Chrome on Speedometer (treeherder.mozilla.org)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/technology@lemmy.ml
32 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)
  • No tablet UI, no tab bar: This is a big downside for me. I set the minimum width on my phone pretty high, so the screen fits as much on there as a small tablet. The lack of tablet UI/tab bar is a pretty big issue
  • The tab drawer is a whole mess in itself. It's really clunky to use, tab reordering (an essential feature if you want to ever e.g. compare products) wasn't available for a very long time. Now it is, but it's super clunky to use. And it's still not available for private tabs.
  • There are addons, but since they only allow a very small selection of addons, they boil down to adblockers and dark reader. There is hardly anything else in there, which is a shame, since FF on Android used to support all addons the desktop browser supported. Their "walled garden" approach to addons also hinders anyone from developing addons for FF on Android, because these addons will likely not be added to the curated list.

Compare that to e.g. Vivaldi:

  • It's got a great tablet UI including a tab bar.
  • The tab drawer works just as expected, pretty much exactly like in old FF
  • It doesn't have addons, but it has adblock (based on and compatible with uBlock Origin) built right into the browser, same with dark mode for websites. All of the addons that both are available on FF for Android and that I care about are built right into Vivaldi.
  • The UI in general is much better. For example, opening a new tab is just one click. Same with switching tabs and closing tabs on the task bar.
  • Additionally, Vivaldi doesn't get a "This page is not compatible with your browser" as often as FF does, and random bugs on websites are also rarer.

The only advantage FF on Android has over Vivaldi is that it's easier to access the reader mode on FF for Android.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I tried Vivaldi, don't really even see a difference between the tab drawers. Except Vivaldi does have bigger tab previews and buttons which feel easier to press. The lack of tab reordering in private mode definitely seems like an oversight.

    Tabs in tablet mode would definitely be cool too, but I don't know what the experience is like on tablet.

    On Android you can just long press links to open private tab or new tab. Seeing Vivaldi's feature bloat if a bottom bar with infrequently used buttons that blocks viewing space, and a completely unnecessary tab bar on mobile that wastes space, feels like an ancient outdated design from 5+ years ago.

    That's kind of Vivaldi's design though, ridiculous feature bloat and cluttering the screen with useless crap instead of trying to preserve screen space when these single press buttons can easily be moved to gestures or condensed. You know, like modern UX design. Like a third of my screen is just gone because of of redundant buttons and UI. Reminds me of Internet Explorer days with Yahoo toolbar.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    Just to make sure, we are talking about Vivaldi on Android, correct?

    Seeing Vivaldi’s feature bloat if a bottom bar with infrequently used buttons that blocks viewing space

    What buttons do you mean? The only two buttons that I see added from Firefox are the history and the adblocker control. Both pretty useful. I also don't see how they block viewing space. What else do you want to view in the bottom bar?

    and a completely unnecessary tab bar on mobile that wastes space

    ... that can be turned off if you don't like it. Also it's an absolute killer feature and one of the main reasons why I chose Vivaldi over FF. If you don't like it, you can turn it off. I much rather have the option to enable/disable a function than to not have the function at all.

    I tried Vivaldi, don’t really even see a difference between the tab drawers.

    Try to drag-and-drop a tab. In Vivaldi, it works exactly as expected.

    On FF it first goes into the multiselection mode and only if you drag it over its stubbornly clingy dead zone can you rip it from its position. ~1/4 of the time the whole screen jumps to a random position, especially if you have many tabs. If you drag too early, the tab doesn't get moved at all, but instead the whole screen moves.

    Other than that, I see that they fixed some of the jankiness that it had a year ago when I last seriously used FF on Android.

    when these single press buttons can easily be moved to gestures or condensed. You know, like modern UX design.

    Gestures are one of the dumbest UX decisions possible, because they lack affordability in most cases. Stuff like swipe to reload/go back/go forward is pretty dumb because you trigger it accidentally a lot.

    Like a third of my screen is just gone because of of redundant buttons and UI. Reminds me of Internet Explorer days with Yahoo toolbar.

    What kind of screen size do you have? On my screen, the bottom bar and the tab row take up maybe 5% of the screen real estate. And again, if you don't like it, disable the tab bar and make the bottom bar auto-hide.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent