you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 40 points 2 years ago (2 children)

TBH I'm surprised it's not higher than that. Even back before the API changes it certainly felt like a lot of front page content was paid for.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    A lot of the shill marketing is very hard to prove. A lot of the dialogue gets mixed in with commentors that have genuine brand loyalty.

    It's far too easy for a marketing team to acquire a high karma account and blend in. We'll never get a truly clear picture of how much Reddit is astroturfed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    This is research from before the API changes. Loads of astroturf efforts were easy to notice, there must have been more subtle ones.

    I always wonder whether the famous post about vacuum cleaners was paid for by the company he recommended. If it was, they got their money's worth - that redditor was convincing.

  • source
  • parent