309
Data poisoning: how artists are sabotaging AI to take revenge on image generators (theconversation.com)
submitted 2 years ago by [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world
99 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Data poisoning: how artists are sabotaging AI to take revenge on image generators::As AI developers indiscriminately suck up online content to train their models, artists are seeking ways to fight back.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

companies would stumble all over themselves to figure out how to get it to stop doing that before going live. source: they already are. see bing image generator appending "ethnically ambiguous" to every prompt it receives

it would be a herculean if not impossible effort on the artists' part only to watch the corpos scramble for max 2 weeks.

when will you people learn that you cannot fight AI by trying to poison it. there is nothing you can do that horny weebs haven't already done.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    The Nightshade poisoning attack claims that it can corrupt a Stable Diffusion in less than 100 samples. Probably not to NSFW level. How easy it is to manufacture those 100 samples is not mentioned in the abstract

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    yeah the operative word in that sentence is "claims"

    I'd love nothing more than to be wrong, but after seeing how quickly Glaze got defeated (not only did it make the images nauseating for a human to look at despite claiming to be invisible, not even 48 hours after the official launch there was a neural network trained to reverse its effects automatically with like 95% accuracy), suffice to say my hopes aren't high.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •