▲ 489 ▼ The instances blocking Zuckerberg's Threads.net (fedipact.veganism.social) submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by registrert@lemmy.sambands.net to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml 131 comments fedilink hide all child comments Made by Nume MacAroon at Veganism.social https://veganism.social/@nm
[–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 17 points 2 years ago (2 children) What is fedipact? permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Masimatutu@mander.xyz 37 points 2 years ago (1 child) "i am an instance admin/mod on the fediverse. by signing this pact, i hereby agree to block any instances owned by meta should they pop up on the fediverse. project92 is a real and serious threat to the health and longevity of fedi and must be fought back against at every possible opportunity" fedipact.online permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 7 points 2 years ago* (1 child) This makes it just confusing? The pink heart = good, but the red cross = good too? But again the red cross seems bad as green = blocked. Sorry I don't get it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Masimatutu@mander.xyz 15 points 2 years ago* (1 child) green checkmark = blocked pink heart = blocked, signed fedipact yellow exclamation mark = limited red cross = not blocked permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 6 points 2 years ago* Thank, I'm probably an idiot :-) Edit: I'll get to it (my instance is small, I'm not very knowledgeable about the nitty gritty stuff, can I do it from Jerboa for example, or is it in some config file? I remember putting someone on the whitelist and thus blocking the whole fediverse...) permalink fedilink source parent [–] 0xtero@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's a silly hashtag för instances that are in a "pact" to block Threads permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) why is silly permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 0xtero@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (3 children) Because the people signed the pact did it long time ago, before any details about Threads federation was known. It was a typical fedi kneejerk reaction. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) You'd have to be a dumbass to federate with these megacorps lol. We're here precisely because of the decisions of one such company. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 0xtero@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago* I guess majority on fedi are dumbasses in that case ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Mastodon is pretty fucked up anyway because everyone is on mastodon.social. permalink fedilink source parent [–] java@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago The key detail about Threads is that it's owned by Meta. That's the reason to block Threads. It was known back then, so there's nothing silly about it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago is facebook permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Masimatutu@mander.xyz 37 points 2 years ago (1 child) "i am an instance admin/mod on the fediverse. by signing this pact, i hereby agree to block any instances owned by meta should they pop up on the fediverse. project92 is a real and serious threat to the health and longevity of fedi and must be fought back against at every possible opportunity" fedipact.online permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 7 points 2 years ago* (1 child) This makes it just confusing? The pink heart = good, but the red cross = good too? But again the red cross seems bad as green = blocked. Sorry I don't get it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Masimatutu@mander.xyz 15 points 2 years ago* (1 child) green checkmark = blocked pink heart = blocked, signed fedipact yellow exclamation mark = limited red cross = not blocked permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 6 points 2 years ago* Thank, I'm probably an idiot :-) Edit: I'll get to it (my instance is small, I'm not very knowledgeable about the nitty gritty stuff, can I do it from Jerboa for example, or is it in some config file? I remember putting someone on the whitelist and thus blocking the whole fediverse...) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 7 points 2 years ago* (1 child) This makes it just confusing? The pink heart = good, but the red cross = good too? But again the red cross seems bad as green = blocked. Sorry I don't get it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Masimatutu@mander.xyz 15 points 2 years ago* (1 child) green checkmark = blocked pink heart = blocked, signed fedipact yellow exclamation mark = limited red cross = not blocked permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 6 points 2 years ago* Thank, I'm probably an idiot :-) Edit: I'll get to it (my instance is small, I'm not very knowledgeable about the nitty gritty stuff, can I do it from Jerboa for example, or is it in some config file? I remember putting someone on the whitelist and thus blocking the whole fediverse...) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Masimatutu@mander.xyz 15 points 2 years ago* (1 child) green checkmark = blocked pink heart = blocked, signed fedipact yellow exclamation mark = limited red cross = not blocked permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 6 points 2 years ago* Thank, I'm probably an idiot :-) Edit: I'll get to it (my instance is small, I'm not very knowledgeable about the nitty gritty stuff, can I do it from Jerboa for example, or is it in some config file? I remember putting someone on the whitelist and thus blocking the whole fediverse...) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 6 points 2 years ago* Thank, I'm probably an idiot :-) Edit: I'll get to it (my instance is small, I'm not very knowledgeable about the nitty gritty stuff, can I do it from Jerboa for example, or is it in some config file? I remember putting someone on the whitelist and thus blocking the whole fediverse...) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 0xtero@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's a silly hashtag för instances that are in a "pact" to block Threads permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) why is silly permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 0xtero@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (3 children) Because the people signed the pact did it long time ago, before any details about Threads federation was known. It was a typical fedi kneejerk reaction. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) You'd have to be a dumbass to federate with these megacorps lol. We're here precisely because of the decisions of one such company. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 0xtero@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago* I guess majority on fedi are dumbasses in that case ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Mastodon is pretty fucked up anyway because everyone is on mastodon.social. permalink fedilink source parent [–] java@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago The key detail about Threads is that it's owned by Meta. That's the reason to block Threads. It was known back then, so there's nothing silly about it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago is facebook permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sour@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) why is silly permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 0xtero@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (3 children) Because the people signed the pact did it long time ago, before any details about Threads federation was known. It was a typical fedi kneejerk reaction. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) You'd have to be a dumbass to federate with these megacorps lol. We're here precisely because of the decisions of one such company. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 0xtero@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago* I guess majority on fedi are dumbasses in that case ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Mastodon is pretty fucked up anyway because everyone is on mastodon.social. permalink fedilink source parent [–] java@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago The key detail about Threads is that it's owned by Meta. That's the reason to block Threads. It was known back then, so there's nothing silly about it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago is facebook permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 0xtero@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (3 children) Because the people signed the pact did it long time ago, before any details about Threads federation was known. It was a typical fedi kneejerk reaction. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) You'd have to be a dumbass to federate with these megacorps lol. We're here precisely because of the decisions of one such company. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 0xtero@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago* I guess majority on fedi are dumbasses in that case ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Mastodon is pretty fucked up anyway because everyone is on mastodon.social. permalink fedilink source parent [–] java@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago The key detail about Threads is that it's owned by Meta. That's the reason to block Threads. It was known back then, so there's nothing silly about it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago is facebook permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) You'd have to be a dumbass to federate with these megacorps lol. We're here precisely because of the decisions of one such company. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 0xtero@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago* I guess majority on fedi are dumbasses in that case ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Mastodon is pretty fucked up anyway because everyone is on mastodon.social. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 0xtero@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago* I guess majority on fedi are dumbasses in that case ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Mastodon is pretty fucked up anyway because everyone is on mastodon.social. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] java@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago The key detail about Threads is that it's owned by Meta. That's the reason to block Threads. It was known back then, so there's nothing silly about it. permalink fedilink source parent