submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
 

Made by Nume MacAroon at Veganism.social https://veganism.social/@nm

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    "i am an instance admin/mod on the fediverse. by signing this pact, i hereby agree to block any instances owned by meta should they pop up on the fediverse. project92 is a real and serious threat to the health and longevity of fedi and must be fought back against at every possible opportunity"

    fedipact.online

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    This makes it just confusing? The pink heart = good, but the red cross = good too? But again the red cross seems bad as green = blocked.

    Sorry I don't get it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago* (1 child)
    • green checkmark = blocked
    • pink heart = blocked, signed fedipact
    • yellow exclamation mark = limited
    • red cross = not blocked
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago*

    Thank, I'm probably an idiot :-)

    Edit: I'll get to it (my instance is small, I'm not very knowledgeable about the nitty gritty stuff, can I do it from Jerboa for example, or is it in some config file? I remember putting someone on the whitelist and thus blocking the whole fediverse...)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's a silly hashtag för instances that are in a "pact" to block Threads

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Because the people signed the pact did it long time ago, before any details about Threads federation was known. It was a typical fedi kneejerk reaction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments