▲ 217 ▼ TikTok requires users to “forever waive” rights to sue over past harms | TikTok may be seeking to avoid increasingly high costs of mass arbitration. (arstechnica.com) submitted 2 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world 13 comments fedilink hide all child comments TikTok requires users to “forever waive” rights to sue over past harms | TikTok may be seeking to avoid increasingly high costs of mass arbitration.::TikTok may be seeking to avoid increasingly high costs of mass arbitration.
[–] bratosch@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Last living monarch of ... Just in general? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (2 children) A contract related to Disney in Florida wanted a forever, couldn't legally do it, but you could do a timeframe from a person, so they picked the last British monarch after a certain birth cutoff, essentially giving them something like 300 years (very rough estimate don't remember well enough) in a contract that wasn't intended to really do more than 100. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago Its crazy they could do that in america permalink fedilink source parent [–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 years ago So it's still possible. Didn't you have a big kerfuffle in 1775 about basing your legal system on a British monarch permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (2 children) A contract related to Disney in Florida wanted a forever, couldn't legally do it, but you could do a timeframe from a person, so they picked the last British monarch after a certain birth cutoff, essentially giving them something like 300 years (very rough estimate don't remember well enough) in a contract that wasn't intended to really do more than 100. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago Its crazy they could do that in america permalink fedilink source parent [–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 years ago So it's still possible. Didn't you have a big kerfuffle in 1775 about basing your legal system on a British monarch permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago Its crazy they could do that in america permalink fedilink source parent
[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 years ago So it's still possible. Didn't you have a big kerfuffle in 1775 about basing your legal system on a British monarch permalink fedilink source parent