▲ 345 ▼ A perfect article reading experience (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by Maven@lemmy.world to c/mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world 55 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 104 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] ech@lemm.ee 20 points 2 years ago (1 child) It really has. Ublock is so versatile, too. It can block pretty much anything. I loathe using browsers without it installed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kaboom36@ani.social 8 points 2 years ago its so nice to just delete annoying parts of websites with it permalink fedilink source parent [–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 13 points 2 years ago I even install it on work computers. It's not just plainly sexually explicit ads. It's malware. Just say no to ads. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Draegur@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) it's about to get EVEN MORE unusable, because increasingly the alleged/so-called "content" behind the nag-wall is utterly mindless AI-generated sludge. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wishthane@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Also so many sites that haven't given in to the ad content farm / have found it to not be worth it are now just putting up paywalls... which I'm okay with in principle, but in reality I can't afford to subscribe to 20 different sites I only read occasionally There's going to need to be a new model of revenue sharing somehow at some point. I wouldn't mind paying for one subscription that gave me broad access, but the problem then is the control that gives whoever collects the money (e.g. YouTube Premium) permalink fedilink source parent [–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) We're starting to see IT departments deploy it by default too! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Agility0971@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago true heroes permalink fedilink source parent [–] lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago a matrix enjoyer, I see. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ech@lemm.ee 20 points 2 years ago (1 child) It really has. Ublock is so versatile, too. It can block pretty much anything. I loathe using browsers without it installed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kaboom36@ani.social 8 points 2 years ago its so nice to just delete annoying parts of websites with it permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kaboom36@ani.social 8 points 2 years ago its so nice to just delete annoying parts of websites with it permalink fedilink source parent
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 13 points 2 years ago I even install it on work computers. It's not just plainly sexually explicit ads. It's malware. Just say no to ads. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) it's about to get EVEN MORE unusable, because increasingly the alleged/so-called "content" behind the nag-wall is utterly mindless AI-generated sludge. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wishthane@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Also so many sites that haven't given in to the ad content farm / have found it to not be worth it are now just putting up paywalls... which I'm okay with in principle, but in reality I can't afford to subscribe to 20 different sites I only read occasionally There's going to need to be a new model of revenue sharing somehow at some point. I wouldn't mind paying for one subscription that gave me broad access, but the problem then is the control that gives whoever collects the money (e.g. YouTube Premium) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wishthane@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Also so many sites that haven't given in to the ad content farm / have found it to not be worth it are now just putting up paywalls... which I'm okay with in principle, but in reality I can't afford to subscribe to 20 different sites I only read occasionally There's going to need to be a new model of revenue sharing somehow at some point. I wouldn't mind paying for one subscription that gave me broad access, but the problem then is the control that gives whoever collects the money (e.g. YouTube Premium) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) We're starting to see IT departments deploy it by default too! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Agility0971@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago true heroes permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago a matrix enjoyer, I see. permalink fedilink source parent
