you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 27 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Adding choice to the customer

"you can have your memory eaten by our website in your browser, or by our website in a separate browser window wearing fake moustache and glasses" doesn't seem to be much of a choice.

meanwhile if you launch their services using something other than a glorified Chrome tab, like spotify-qt or ripcord, they both end up consuming like one tenth of the resources the official clients do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Why do you think everyone cares to optimize every single ounce of their ram memory. There is a lot more to UX than that.

    I would rather an imperfect choice than none at all

  • source
  • parent