A federal judge has blocked the state of Hawaii from enforcing a recently enacted ban on firearms on its prized beaches and in other areas including banks, bars and parks, citing last year's landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling expanding gun rights.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 32 points 3 years ago (12 children)

Why the fuck does anyone need a gun on the beach? I can’t think of one justifiable argument for needing one there.

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    But, what if someone sees an undesirable, having a good time, and simply wants to exercise their god-given right to harass them without fear of consequences?

    How do you stand your ground at them without this most basic thing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    It’s really sad that a lot of Americans think that’s an actual valid argument.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    It's not a valid argument, because frankly both harassment and brandishing a firearm are both illegal everywhere in the USA, which means there actually is consequences.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    A well tanned Militia, being necessary to the security of a free Shore, the right of the beachgoers to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago*

    The law in question prohibits licensed carry of firearms from a list of areas and premises, it does not only ban guns on beaches.

    posted by @30mag@lemmy.world

  • source
  • parent