▲ 565 ▼ Steam Deck OLED now supports HDR Remote Play from PS5, unlike PlayStation Portal (www.tomshardware.com) submitted 2 years ago by Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz [M] to c/steamdeck@sopuli.xyz 89 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (4 children) Quite a price difference between them to be fair. permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz [S] 45 points 2 years ago (2 children) Honestly the PS Portal seems extremely expensive for a remote play only device. I feel like the Deck is a much better value proposition with it being able to play games on it's own and work away from your home network. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) I agree it is. That said. This isn't an even match, and they are sold as two different use cases. One is a full on computer, the other is literally just a single purpose thin client "portal." You should consider any bells and whistles that come with a 500+ device, like hdr, showing up on a 200 device a friggin miracle bonus. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz [S] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) To be fair, the deck can be a lot cheaper than 500+. Comparing a $350 64GB LCD deck to a $200 PS Portal really favors the Deck. Neither device supports HDR at that price, but the Deck can do so much more than the Portal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] echo64@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm just gonna drop this comment to say this community seems super disappointing. Just a circle jerk. It's not a competition between your favorite thing and another thing. It's okay for some people to spend less for something else. I really hate communities that act this way. it's so weird. And for what. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz [S] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children) Personally I was just really disappointed with the PS Portal pricing, feels priced far too high for what it is. I think stream only devices can be decent, but they need to be priced more competitively. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] echo64@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Shrug, the thing sold out at that price point. It can be "too expensive" and also the right price for the market. And honestly, a display, an arm chipset, good wifi, Bluetooth, all the dualsense modules. The cost of production adds up. There have been a lot of armchair experts around this thing whinging about it, but people who bought them are super happy. Why rain on that parade? Just be cool about it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago It's priced badly but idk if I can call it priced unreasonably because it contains a dualsense controller which is expensive as is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago I'm not a PS Portal customer at any price point and I'm a consistent Sony customer. Maybe if they got it down to the $99-$129 range? It just doesn't make any sense to me given the options out there. permalink fedilink source parent [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz [S] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Brand new 64GB Decks are still available for $350. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago* To be fair that's the older LCD model, not the OLED the article is discussing, which is 549 minimum permalink fedilink source parent [–] lemmylickyourfanfan@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) One is a gaming pc, and the other is a controller with a screen that lags doing its one job. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) Fully aware. Kind of the point I was making. It's a cheaper device for a reason. This is like complaining that a chromebook has no local graphics horsepower. No shit? Why did you buy it expecting that? Oh because you picked the cheapest thing that vaguely resembled the form factor of what you wanted and expected it to do all the things the far more expensive options can? Neither of these devices are brand gouging, you're getting the hardware capacity you're paying for. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] roeeeeeeeee@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yet Sony’s device main focus should be the screen, since it’s just a portable screen… permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lemmylickyourfanfan@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago* The fact that they didn’t even put a WiFi 6 capable card in it shows they don’t give a shit about delivering a good product. People will still buy it regardless. That’s why they don’t care. Reviewers: “It lags and is often unplayable” Gamers: “SIGN ME UP!” permalink fedilink source parent [+] lemmylickyourfanfan@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago* [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] rishado@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago I feel like the fact that this is downvoted is showing the disconnection that Lemmy has as a hub for tech inclined users, I know many people waiting to buy the portal and while I know it's kind of a useless device, it works for a lot of people and $200 is at about that sweet spot. permalink fedilink source parent [–] thorbot@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) It isn’t though? PS portal is $200 and first edition Steam decks are going for $300 on eBay lightly used… permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* I mean, just going by the feature being discussed here, that refurb non-oled doesn't have HDR. The steam deck is a better device by far. By leaps and bounds. It is nice that there is a cheaper option for those that already have a Playstation though. You can get a 15 year old BMW for the price of a base kia. It doesn't make KIAs and BMWs comparable vehicles. Both things can exist and have their niche. This need not be a competition. The steamdeck has actual competition, the PS portal ain't it. It's a different animal that happens to have similar form factor. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz [S] 45 points 2 years ago (2 children) Honestly the PS Portal seems extremely expensive for a remote play only device. I feel like the Deck is a much better value proposition with it being able to play games on it's own and work away from your home network. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) I agree it is. That said. This isn't an even match, and they are sold as two different use cases. One is a full on computer, the other is literally just a single purpose thin client "portal." You should consider any bells and whistles that come with a 500+ device, like hdr, showing up on a 200 device a friggin miracle bonus. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz [S] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) To be fair, the deck can be a lot cheaper than 500+. Comparing a $350 64GB LCD deck to a $200 PS Portal really favors the Deck. Neither device supports HDR at that price, but the Deck can do so much more than the Portal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] echo64@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm just gonna drop this comment to say this community seems super disappointing. Just a circle jerk. It's not a competition between your favorite thing and another thing. It's okay for some people to spend less for something else. I really hate communities that act this way. it's so weird. And for what. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz [S] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children) Personally I was just really disappointed with the PS Portal pricing, feels priced far too high for what it is. I think stream only devices can be decent, but they need to be priced more competitively. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] echo64@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Shrug, the thing sold out at that price point. It can be "too expensive" and also the right price for the market. And honestly, a display, an arm chipset, good wifi, Bluetooth, all the dualsense modules. The cost of production adds up. There have been a lot of armchair experts around this thing whinging about it, but people who bought them are super happy. Why rain on that parade? Just be cool about it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago It's priced badly but idk if I can call it priced unreasonably because it contains a dualsense controller which is expensive as is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago I'm not a PS Portal customer at any price point and I'm a consistent Sony customer. Maybe if they got it down to the $99-$129 range? It just doesn't make any sense to me given the options out there. permalink fedilink source parent [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz [S] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Brand new 64GB Decks are still available for $350. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago* To be fair that's the older LCD model, not the OLED the article is discussing, which is 549 minimum permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) I agree it is. That said. This isn't an even match, and they are sold as two different use cases. One is a full on computer, the other is literally just a single purpose thin client "portal." You should consider any bells and whistles that come with a 500+ device, like hdr, showing up on a 200 device a friggin miracle bonus. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz [S] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) To be fair, the deck can be a lot cheaper than 500+. Comparing a $350 64GB LCD deck to a $200 PS Portal really favors the Deck. Neither device supports HDR at that price, but the Deck can do so much more than the Portal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] echo64@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm just gonna drop this comment to say this community seems super disappointing. Just a circle jerk. It's not a competition between your favorite thing and another thing. It's okay for some people to spend less for something else. I really hate communities that act this way. it's so weird. And for what. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz [S] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children) Personally I was just really disappointed with the PS Portal pricing, feels priced far too high for what it is. I think stream only devices can be decent, but they need to be priced more competitively. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] echo64@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Shrug, the thing sold out at that price point. It can be "too expensive" and also the right price for the market. And honestly, a display, an arm chipset, good wifi, Bluetooth, all the dualsense modules. The cost of production adds up. There have been a lot of armchair experts around this thing whinging about it, but people who bought them are super happy. Why rain on that parade? Just be cool about it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago It's priced badly but idk if I can call it priced unreasonably because it contains a dualsense controller which is expensive as is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago I'm not a PS Portal customer at any price point and I'm a consistent Sony customer. Maybe if they got it down to the $99-$129 range? It just doesn't make any sense to me given the options out there. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz [S] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) To be fair, the deck can be a lot cheaper than 500+. Comparing a $350 64GB LCD deck to a $200 PS Portal really favors the Deck. Neither device supports HDR at that price, but the Deck can do so much more than the Portal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] echo64@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm just gonna drop this comment to say this community seems super disappointing. Just a circle jerk. It's not a competition between your favorite thing and another thing. It's okay for some people to spend less for something else. I really hate communities that act this way. it's so weird. And for what. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz [S] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children) Personally I was just really disappointed with the PS Portal pricing, feels priced far too high for what it is. I think stream only devices can be decent, but they need to be priced more competitively. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] echo64@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Shrug, the thing sold out at that price point. It can be "too expensive" and also the right price for the market. And honestly, a display, an arm chipset, good wifi, Bluetooth, all the dualsense modules. The cost of production adds up. There have been a lot of armchair experts around this thing whinging about it, but people who bought them are super happy. Why rain on that parade? Just be cool about it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago It's priced badly but idk if I can call it priced unreasonably because it contains a dualsense controller which is expensive as is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago I'm not a PS Portal customer at any price point and I'm a consistent Sony customer. Maybe if they got it down to the $99-$129 range? It just doesn't make any sense to me given the options out there. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] echo64@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm just gonna drop this comment to say this community seems super disappointing. Just a circle jerk. It's not a competition between your favorite thing and another thing. It's okay for some people to spend less for something else. I really hate communities that act this way. it's so weird. And for what. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz [S] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children) Personally I was just really disappointed with the PS Portal pricing, feels priced far too high for what it is. I think stream only devices can be decent, but they need to be priced more competitively. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] echo64@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Shrug, the thing sold out at that price point. It can be "too expensive" and also the right price for the market. And honestly, a display, an arm chipset, good wifi, Bluetooth, all the dualsense modules. The cost of production adds up. There have been a lot of armchair experts around this thing whinging about it, but people who bought them are super happy. Why rain on that parade? Just be cool about it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago It's priced badly but idk if I can call it priced unreasonably because it contains a dualsense controller which is expensive as is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago I'm not a PS Portal customer at any price point and I'm a consistent Sony customer. Maybe if they got it down to the $99-$129 range? It just doesn't make any sense to me given the options out there. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz [S] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children) Personally I was just really disappointed with the PS Portal pricing, feels priced far too high for what it is. I think stream only devices can be decent, but they need to be priced more competitively. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] echo64@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Shrug, the thing sold out at that price point. It can be "too expensive" and also the right price for the market. And honestly, a display, an arm chipset, good wifi, Bluetooth, all the dualsense modules. The cost of production adds up. There have been a lot of armchair experts around this thing whinging about it, but people who bought them are super happy. Why rain on that parade? Just be cool about it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago It's priced badly but idk if I can call it priced unreasonably because it contains a dualsense controller which is expensive as is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago I'm not a PS Portal customer at any price point and I'm a consistent Sony customer. Maybe if they got it down to the $99-$129 range? It just doesn't make any sense to me given the options out there. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] echo64@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Shrug, the thing sold out at that price point. It can be "too expensive" and also the right price for the market. And honestly, a display, an arm chipset, good wifi, Bluetooth, all the dualsense modules. The cost of production adds up. There have been a lot of armchair experts around this thing whinging about it, but people who bought them are super happy. Why rain on that parade? Just be cool about it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago It's priced badly but idk if I can call it priced unreasonably because it contains a dualsense controller which is expensive as is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago I'm not a PS Portal customer at any price point and I'm a consistent Sony customer. Maybe if they got it down to the $99-$129 range? It just doesn't make any sense to me given the options out there. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] helenslunch@feddit.nl -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz [S] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Brand new 64GB Decks are still available for $350. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago* To be fair that's the older LCD model, not the OLED the article is discussing, which is 549 minimum permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz [S] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Brand new 64GB Decks are still available for $350. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago* To be fair that's the older LCD model, not the OLED the article is discussing, which is 549 minimum permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago* To be fair that's the older LCD model, not the OLED the article is discussing, which is 549 minimum permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lemmylickyourfanfan@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) One is a gaming pc, and the other is a controller with a screen that lags doing its one job. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) Fully aware. Kind of the point I was making. It's a cheaper device for a reason. This is like complaining that a chromebook has no local graphics horsepower. No shit? Why did you buy it expecting that? Oh because you picked the cheapest thing that vaguely resembled the form factor of what you wanted and expected it to do all the things the far more expensive options can? Neither of these devices are brand gouging, you're getting the hardware capacity you're paying for. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] roeeeeeeeee@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yet Sony’s device main focus should be the screen, since it’s just a portable screen… permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lemmylickyourfanfan@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago* The fact that they didn’t even put a WiFi 6 capable card in it shows they don’t give a shit about delivering a good product. People will still buy it regardless. That’s why they don’t care. Reviewers: “It lags and is often unplayable” Gamers: “SIGN ME UP!” permalink fedilink source parent [+] lemmylickyourfanfan@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago* [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) Fully aware. Kind of the point I was making. It's a cheaper device for a reason. This is like complaining that a chromebook has no local graphics horsepower. No shit? Why did you buy it expecting that? Oh because you picked the cheapest thing that vaguely resembled the form factor of what you wanted and expected it to do all the things the far more expensive options can? Neither of these devices are brand gouging, you're getting the hardware capacity you're paying for. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] roeeeeeeeee@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yet Sony’s device main focus should be the screen, since it’s just a portable screen… permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lemmylickyourfanfan@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago* The fact that they didn’t even put a WiFi 6 capable card in it shows they don’t give a shit about delivering a good product. People will still buy it regardless. That’s why they don’t care. Reviewers: “It lags and is often unplayable” Gamers: “SIGN ME UP!” permalink fedilink source parent [+] lemmylickyourfanfan@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago* [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] roeeeeeeeee@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yet Sony’s device main focus should be the screen, since it’s just a portable screen… permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lemmylickyourfanfan@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago* The fact that they didn’t even put a WiFi 6 capable card in it shows they don’t give a shit about delivering a good product. People will still buy it regardless. That’s why they don’t care. Reviewers: “It lags and is often unplayable” Gamers: “SIGN ME UP!” permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lemmylickyourfanfan@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago* The fact that they didn’t even put a WiFi 6 capable card in it shows they don’t give a shit about delivering a good product. People will still buy it regardless. That’s why they don’t care. Reviewers: “It lags and is often unplayable” Gamers: “SIGN ME UP!” permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rishado@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago I feel like the fact that this is downvoted is showing the disconnection that Lemmy has as a hub for tech inclined users, I know many people waiting to buy the portal and while I know it's kind of a useless device, it works for a lot of people and $200 is at about that sweet spot. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] thorbot@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) It isn’t though? PS portal is $200 and first edition Steam decks are going for $300 on eBay lightly used… permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* I mean, just going by the feature being discussed here, that refurb non-oled doesn't have HDR. The steam deck is a better device by far. By leaps and bounds. It is nice that there is a cheaper option for those that already have a Playstation though. You can get a 15 year old BMW for the price of a base kia. It doesn't make KIAs and BMWs comparable vehicles. Both things can exist and have their niche. This need not be a competition. The steamdeck has actual competition, the PS portal ain't it. It's a different animal that happens to have similar form factor. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* I mean, just going by the feature being discussed here, that refurb non-oled doesn't have HDR. The steam deck is a better device by far. By leaps and bounds. It is nice that there is a cheaper option for those that already have a Playstation though. You can get a 15 year old BMW for the price of a base kia. It doesn't make KIAs and BMWs comparable vehicles. Both things can exist and have their niche. This need not be a competition. The steamdeck has actual competition, the PS portal ain't it. It's a different animal that happens to have similar form factor. permalink fedilink source parent