Technology

parent

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Then, suddenly, you realize how extensively it causes problems when you’re a photographer trying to get magazines to pay for copies of the once-in-a-lifetime photo you took

That's a pretty specific example. Probably because in many cases photographers are paid in advance. A wedding photographer doesn't show up at the wedding, take a lot of pictures, then try to work out a deal with the couple getting married. They negotiate a fee before the wedding, and when the wedding is over they turn over the pictures in exchange for the money. Other photographers work on a salary.

Besides, even with your convoluted, overly-specific example, even without a copyright, a magazine would probably pay for the photo. Even if they didn't get to control the copying of the photo, they could still get the scoop and have the picture out before other people. In your world, how would they "reprint" it without your permission? Would they break into your house and sneakily download it from your phone or camera?

parent

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/09/one-mans-endless-hopeless-struggle-to-protect-his-copyrighted-images/

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

This is the kind of situation I’m citing:

A lot of photography is not based on planning ahead before being paid (a person requests Photo X, and then pays on delivery). Nature photographers, and in fact many other forms of artists, produce a work before people know/feel they want it, and then sell it based on demonstration - a media outlet notices their work in a gallery or on their website, and then requests use of that work themselves.

The struggles of the above insect photographer are even with the existing IP laws - they only ask for fair compensation from what they’ve put so much effort into, and VERY MANY media outlets don’t bother; to say nothing of giving a charitable donation.

parent

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago (1 child)

then sell it based on demonstration - a media outlet notices their work in a gallery or on their website

So, they choose to rely on copyright, when they could do work for hire instead.

they only ask for fair compensation from what they’ve put so much effort into

No, they ask for unfair compensation based on copyrights.

parent

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

No - they CAN’T do work for hire. Are you listening?

“Hi. I do really cool photos. Please hire me to take one, and after you’ve paid me, you can see it.”

According to you, that’s a comprehensive resume and advertisement for a photographer, absent of a single graphic. According to you, a client could come to a consult about buying a photo, sneak their phone camera up to the print, and say “Never mind about payment! I just copied it. You can keep the print! So long, loser.”

You’re not even trying to imagine the impossible hurdles such a craft would have trying to earn enough to eat food every day, much less have a roof over their head. If you have nothing substantive to add, everyone on this site should be done with you.

parent

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago

No - they CAN’T do work for hire. Are you listening?

Your inability to imagine anything other than the status quo is really depressing.