The law ( the Leahy Law) requires that the US vet any foreign military receiving US arms. However, that doesn’t happen with Israel

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

My theory, also supported by other US government actions in the Middle East (such as the Iraq war) is that the US government’s overall goal in the Middle East is destabilization.

The exact opposite is the actual reason the US supports Israel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    This is correct. I was down with that post until this same sentence. Dude started off on the right path and then just went 180 in the wrong direction.

    Israel is the sole democracy in the middle east, defined as a flawed democracy (same as America) by political science.

    If we stopped supplying it with weapons and might, it would be overrun by Iran and the Israeli people would be killed to the last. Iran will never stop arming and funding terrorism against Israel. Any apparent respect Iran shows to Israel's borders or legitimacy is an act, a pretext of peace, an armistice really, until they wage total war against Israel. Iranians man, don't let the world have anything nice. It is not in America's national interest to let the only democracy in the region fall, and lose any hope for human rights in the middleeast.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago

    Yep. You don't need a fancy graduate degree in IR to know this. US policy in the Middle East has always been a pretty open book. The fact that it's often been disastrous isn't evidence of some vast conspiracy to keep the Arab world down. To the contrary, it's evidence of deep stupidity, hubris, arrogance and wilful ignorance on the part of US leadership. Never attribute to malice that which can more easily be attributed to stupidity.

  • source
  • parent