624
USA Will Invest in High-Speed Train to Fight Climate Change (www.raillynews.com)
submitted 2 years ago by [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world
103 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

USA Will Invest in High-Speed ​​Train to Fight Climate Change::The USA Will Invest in High-Speed ​​Train to Fight Climate Change - US President Joe Biden announced in a speech on December 9, 2023 that they are carrying out the first high-speed train projects in US history. These projects are across America

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 33 points 2 years ago (5 children)

It’ll take the US decades to get high-speed rail up and running, especially with its culture of litigation, property rights, regulatory capture and politicised overregulation of threats to incumbents, not to mention Citizens United and the ability of the aforementioned incumbents to buy laws and regulations. By then, climate change will have won.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Let's say, ten years in the future, a brilliant scientist invents a magic box that drastically reduces some of the biggest inflictors of CO2, and/or even repairs some of the previous damage. Such a marvelous invention would only be valuable in saving the human race if there were simultaneously other improvements on efficiency and CO2 generation to improve the overall reductions.

    Movies get us used to one person/initiative saving the world. What's more practical is a whole bunch of little initiatives - even if each one doesn't do enough on its own.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    You've got to love internet negativity. Nothing can ever be good.

    There are plenty of issues to deal with, but this is a huge improvement over the existing status-quo. Can we be happy that the Biden Administration has done something to move things in the right direction on this issue?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    I'm betting this money will just go to bribe some political donors. Take note that the amount of investment here is less than what was outlayed to increase the number of EV chargers in the US (which hasn't happened) for something that is orders of magnitude more expensive and complicated than installing battery chargers. California is working on a 171-mile stretch of HSR, and the estimated cost is projected to be around $35 billion in a state with tons of open, undeveloped land. Imagine the cost of doing this along the densely populated eastern seaboard. $8 billion in grants is a joke.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent