63
US FTC tries again to stop Microsoft's already-closed deal for Activision (www.reuters.com)
submitted 2 years ago by [M] to c/games@sh.itjust.works
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 18 points 2 years ago (1 child)

This is a straw man. Nobody is saying they're a monopoly. They're saying Microsoft has a history of anti competitive behavior.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] -7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    If this is a strawman, where is the anti-competitive behaviour in this deal?

    A history of anti-competitive choices should not be resolved by undoing some random, unrelated choice. The only reason they would have to block Microsoft's acquisition is if it was anti-competitive.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    in what way is buying a competitor not inherently anti-competitive?

    If someone has a history of anti-competitive behavior, preventing them from buying competitors is perfectly logical

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    In the entertainment industry, there are not a lot of real competitors, if any.

    I can't think of any scenario where Microsoft makes something, and any reasonable human would think "well, it's too bad Activision Blizzard isn't still making games on their own, it sure would have increased the quality of "

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent