I mean, sort of?

We created a big problem by injecting a lot of shit where it shouldn't be. If we stop that, some pieces will bounce back.

Injecting more shit in another place means we have one big problem, that we haven't stopped, and now a new problem that we don't know the repurcussions of or how to reverse.

So uh, yeah, I'll stick with the one beast we know over one we know and also another we don't.

It is much easier to destroy something than it is to repair it. This applies to the original changes we made through exploitation, pollution, etc. But also to the radical change you propose, it is much easier for it to have a destructive effect compared to having a positive effect.