Bigoted means anti non-white? Interesting

Malaysia in a Muslim country (63%) with a Democracy Index of 7.30. Belgium is 7.64, Poland is 7.04.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Economist_Democracy_Index

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_Malaysia

Have you never asked yourself why so many people of this one religion turn out to have “psychological problems”? What are the chances of that statistically if, as you seem to suggest, religion has nothing to do with this?

No, because this is horseshit. Muslims in Europe aren't more violent than non muslims. They are more often subject to violence and discrimination by the white majority though. It is just that violence commited by muslims, or people claimed to be muslim is disproporitonately sensationalized by right wing media. Of course this is accompanied with white supremacists spurting desinformation and claiming every crime, where no information on nationality, skin colour or religion of the suspects is known, as being commited by muslims. Also violence against muslims is systematically underreported, but that would make for another dozens paragraphs.

and in response you are insisting on essentializing them on the basis of biology. Have you considered how close this puts you to people you claim to abhor?

You are wrong. I'm warning him, that this will be done to him, by the people whose agenda he is supporting, by making evidently false claims about the suspect and the treatment of the suspect. He is also blowing the right wing dogwhistle of violent muslims being "imported" to Europe. And the fascists whose position he is strengthening by doing this will not care. Just earlier this week an ex-muslim gay men of turkish origin wanted to join the German Nazi party AfD. He was met with calls to violence and having him deported, that led to him experiencing more racism and hostility in a few days, than in his entire life in Germany before. The fascist dogs will not accept him for blowing their whistle. They'll tear him apart like everybody else if they get the chance to.

Regardless of color, I was saying that the west should be careful about Muslims.

That’s not what you said.

And even that is a pretty fucking backward thing to type.

calling me a bigot without giving any reason.

You give me new reasons every comment.

If you don’t see this, you ought to re-evaluate.

At a guess, you seem to be talking to a member of a generation that never got contradicted during its childhood, that believes it has all the answers, that sees dissenters to its groupthink as social deviants who need be silenced. The Western enlightenment is yesterday's news, we've moved on in the West! Well done for keeping your cool and staying polite.

He's not defending terrorists, he's defending Muslims

I would take that money from you. I’m way older than you imply.

And no, you did not get it. The invitation to apologize was not for his thoughts/opinion. It was for his words if they did not match his thoughts. It’s customary, in many cultures, that if you do something hurtful but don’t mean it, you apologize.

It’s not hard.

Why are we taking about skin color? Why do you keep bringing up skin color?

I’m not gonna sorry because you understand my sentences wrong.

Maybe just well since sorry understand very hard.