▲ 413 ▼ Spotify made £56m profit, but has decided not to pay smaller artists like me. We need you to make some noise | Damon Krukowski (www.theguardian.com) submitted 2 years ago* by Masimatutu@mander.xyz to c/technology@beehaw.org 144 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] cwagner@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I doubt it pays much better, the issue might be partially the distribution, but mainly that they are too cheap. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kiloee@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) While it isn’t a lot more in general it is still about three times of Spotify. It also takes into consideration which artists you actually stream afaik, so that your money goes more towards those. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ericjmorey@beehaw.org 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Look like Tidal pays 4x more than Spotify on average. For small artists, it's likely hundreds of times more. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kiloee@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) While it isn’t a lot more in general it is still about three times of Spotify. It also takes into consideration which artists you actually stream afaik, so that your money goes more towards those. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ericjmorey@beehaw.org 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Look like Tidal pays 4x more than Spotify on average. For small artists, it's likely hundreds of times more. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ericjmorey@beehaw.org 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Look like Tidal pays 4x more than Spotify on average. For small artists, it's likely hundreds of times more. permalink fedilink source parent