you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -12 points 2 years ago (4 children)

You're just not old enough. Cursive was everywhere when I was a kid. They should still teach it to children because children learn language and writing easier than adults do. We should be able to read cursive. It is part of our language, and our history. Every old document is written in cursive. We shouldn't end up with a society that can't even read its original Constitution. That's just Idiocracy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [+] -7 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    On a regular basis? No. Ever? Of course. Shakespeare is written in old English, the original translation of Homer's The Odyssey, and the King James Bible, to name a few things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    The King James Bible is pretty much modern English. Shakespeare too. They actually sort of standardized modern English. Old English, the language,not just English that is old, looks like Icelandic or weird German and is maybe 500 years older than that, give or take.

    Edit: Everyone who down voted your comment is dumb. Being willing to learn new things is a mark of high intelligence. Being grateful for the opportunity to learn is the sign of wisdom. Those who downvote you should instead emulate you. If we punish people for being happy to learn, they won't want to learn.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I didn't know that. Thanks for the correction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    We are all constantly learning. Thank you for participating in this group discussion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Who the fuck understands old english??

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    I grew up in a house with a rotary phone and a meticulously maintained phone book (written in cursive.) If I'm too young to have been able to reliable hone my cursive-parsing skills, what can we expect of younger generations?

    The Flynn effect suggests people are generally getting smarter, remembering things better, etc. Something is happening to cause younger generations to be generally better than their ancestors. IQ scores have their problems but it's still a hopeful sign.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Different circles I guess then. Everyone I knew wrote in cursive when I was younger. Regarding your intelligence comment, it's not an intelligence issue, just an education and exposure issue. Learning cursive is easier than learning to write all-together, but if you're never taught, and you're not exposed to it, then you're probably not going to learn it. It's such a simple thing to learn that I don't understand the aversion everyone on this thread has towards it. It's pretty nice when you have to write a lot of text, like taking notes or journaling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Language changes. Teaching an entire script to be able to read translated documents when there are practical skills that could be taught instead is silly.

    We don't teach old English anymore, even though there's a huge amount of our cultural history contained in it.
    We don't even teach people about the eras when we used to use "f" in place if "s", and that's right in the middle of the constitution.

    Can you read the original magna carta? America would not be unique amongst English speaking nations in having issues dealing with language drift.

  • source
  • parent