klangcola comments on Spotify made £56m profit, but has decided not to pay smaller artists like me. We need you to make some noise

Technology

43,308 readers

2,274 active

149 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago

moderators

[–] klangcola@reddthat.com 16 points 2 years ago (4 children)

How much of this is Spotify's fault and how much is the major record labels sitting between Spotify and the individual artists?

And is there a better place for us consumers to go and vote with our wallet? Ideally somewhere that isn't one of the 5 major tech giants that control everything

permalink

fedilink

source

hideshow 8 child comments

[–] mkhoury@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago

Cory Doctorow writes extensively about how it's Spotify's fault, as an extension of the common exploitation of musicians in the industry, in the excellent book Chokepoint Capitalism. Here's a short summary of the Spotify argument by the author: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZ5z_KKeFqE

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] raptir@lemdro.id 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The newest part, which is Spotify refusing to payout what small artists are owed if they don't hit a certain streaming threshold, is 100% on Spotify.

For alternatives, Tidal allegedly pays better and at least doesn't do this. Qobuz is not owned by any big tech company.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago