โฒ 214 โผ Russians' support of Ukraine war collapses, finds poll (www.euronews.com) submitted 2 years ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/europe@feddit.de 26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[โ] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 12 points 2 years ago (2 children) How can anybody make an opinion poll in Russia that is even remotely accurate? This is just rubbish. permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [โ] misk@sopuli.xyz [S] 21 points 2 years ago The overall result is probably not very accurate but if the methodology has not changed then you could try to gauge something based on change from poll to poll. permalink fedilink source parent [โ] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 years ago (1 child) There was an interesting methodology I read about. Basically, they read 4 statements and asked how many (not which!) the interviewee agreed with. Then they did the same thing with 5 statements, where the 5th was what they actually wanted to find out. With a large enough sample size on both and the power of math, they can essentially deduct test 1 from test 2 to find out how many people agree with the 5th statement without anybody outing themselves to the FSB. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] sergih@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) sohnds interestind, do u know what the methodology is called? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [โ] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago Sorry, I read about this technique over a year ago, and I can't seem to formulate the right Google search to re-find it. permalink fedilink source parent [โ] frostbiker@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) It is called the "unmatched count technique" or "list experiment." It has a wider error range, so you need to poll more people, but you get honest answers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] sergih@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago Love it, such a smart technique permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] misk@sopuli.xyz [S] 21 points 2 years ago The overall result is probably not very accurate but if the methodology has not changed then you could try to gauge something based on change from poll to poll. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 years ago (1 child) There was an interesting methodology I read about. Basically, they read 4 statements and asked how many (not which!) the interviewee agreed with. Then they did the same thing with 5 statements, where the 5th was what they actually wanted to find out. With a large enough sample size on both and the power of math, they can essentially deduct test 1 from test 2 to find out how many people agree with the 5th statement without anybody outing themselves to the FSB. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] sergih@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) sohnds interestind, do u know what the methodology is called? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [โ] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago Sorry, I read about this technique over a year ago, and I can't seem to formulate the right Google search to re-find it. permalink fedilink source parent [โ] frostbiker@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) It is called the "unmatched count technique" or "list experiment." It has a wider error range, so you need to poll more people, but you get honest answers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] sergih@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago Love it, such a smart technique permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] sergih@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) sohnds interestind, do u know what the methodology is called? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [โ] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago Sorry, I read about this technique over a year ago, and I can't seem to formulate the right Google search to re-find it. permalink fedilink source parent [โ] frostbiker@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) It is called the "unmatched count technique" or "list experiment." It has a wider error range, so you need to poll more people, but you get honest answers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] sergih@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago Love it, such a smart technique permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago Sorry, I read about this technique over a year ago, and I can't seem to formulate the right Google search to re-find it. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] frostbiker@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) It is called the "unmatched count technique" or "list experiment." It has a wider error range, so you need to poll more people, but you get honest answers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] sergih@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago Love it, such a smart technique permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] sergih@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago Love it, such a smart technique permalink fedilink source parent