I’ve seen a lot of recommends for Immich on here, so I have an idea what the answer here is going to be, but I’m looking for some comparisons between it and Photoprism I’m currently using Synology Photos, and I think my biggest issue is it’s lack of metadata management. I’ve gotten around that with MetaImage and NeoFinder. I’m considering moving to something not tied to the Synology environment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 25 points 3 years ago* (2 children)

Immich vs Photoprism.

Winner = Immich

Best comparison ever

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    Isn't Photoprism more stable?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    In what sense? Never had problems with Immich.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    In the sense that immich warns not be the only way to store your pictures, while Photoprism advertises as a bug-free program, that adds new features very slowly in order to be bug free.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Maybe, but why would you store your images in only one place to begin with?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    Can't you just mount a RO volume to an Immich container?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments