▲ 293 ▼ Appeals court reinstates gag order that barred Trump from maligning court staff in NY fraud trial (apnews.com) submitted 2 years ago by GiddyGap@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world 34 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Not acting out of fear is essentially allowing them to negotiate the outcome of his trial. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Can you elaborate? I don't follow. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) You’re suggesting he’s getting treated with kid gloves because of his army of terrorists. I’m saying that’s not how things work. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Ah I see, well he's clearly being treated differently than a normal defendant and I speculated on why, but after reading this comment I agree with @PM_Your_Nudes_Please that it's probably more about denying him a case for appeal even if it means treating his behaviors with more leniency than a normal defendant. Getting it right is important because of the damage he can cause, (due to said army and the scary possibility of reelection,) if he gets off with a technicality. I'm referring to his legal woes in general and not just this trial, he's been trying stochastic terrorism in many of them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago Holy shit I was about to copy/paste that exact same comment in response if you question further. I totally agree! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Can you elaborate? I don't follow. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) You’re suggesting he’s getting treated with kid gloves because of his army of terrorists. I’m saying that’s not how things work. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Ah I see, well he's clearly being treated differently than a normal defendant and I speculated on why, but after reading this comment I agree with @PM_Your_Nudes_Please that it's probably more about denying him a case for appeal even if it means treating his behaviors with more leniency than a normal defendant. Getting it right is important because of the damage he can cause, (due to said army and the scary possibility of reelection,) if he gets off with a technicality. I'm referring to his legal woes in general and not just this trial, he's been trying stochastic terrorism in many of them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago Holy shit I was about to copy/paste that exact same comment in response if you question further. I totally agree! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) You’re suggesting he’s getting treated with kid gloves because of his army of terrorists. I’m saying that’s not how things work. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Ah I see, well he's clearly being treated differently than a normal defendant and I speculated on why, but after reading this comment I agree with @PM_Your_Nudes_Please that it's probably more about denying him a case for appeal even if it means treating his behaviors with more leniency than a normal defendant. Getting it right is important because of the damage he can cause, (due to said army and the scary possibility of reelection,) if he gets off with a technicality. I'm referring to his legal woes in general and not just this trial, he's been trying stochastic terrorism in many of them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago Holy shit I was about to copy/paste that exact same comment in response if you question further. I totally agree! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Ah I see, well he's clearly being treated differently than a normal defendant and I speculated on why, but after reading this comment I agree with @PM_Your_Nudes_Please that it's probably more about denying him a case for appeal even if it means treating his behaviors with more leniency than a normal defendant. Getting it right is important because of the damage he can cause, (due to said army and the scary possibility of reelection,) if he gets off with a technicality. I'm referring to his legal woes in general and not just this trial, he's been trying stochastic terrorism in many of them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago Holy shit I was about to copy/paste that exact same comment in response if you question further. I totally agree! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago Holy shit I was about to copy/paste that exact same comment in response if you question further. I totally agree! permalink fedilink source parent