▲ 256 ▼ A bride to be discovers a reality bending mistake in Apple's computational photography (appleinsider.com) submitted 2 years ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/technology@lemmy.world 96 comments fedilink hide all child comments A U.K. woman was photographed standing in a mirror where her reflections didn't match, but not because of a glitch in the Matrix. Instead, it's a simple iPhone computational photography mistake.
[+] Decoy321@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sure, but smartphones now automatically doctor every photo you take. Someone who took the photo could not even know it was doctored and think it represents truth. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Decoy321@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Fair point, but I still think we're exaggerating the amount of doctoring that's being done by the phones. There's always been some level of discrepancy between real life subjects and the images taken of them. It's just a tool creating media from sensor data. Those sensors aren't the same as our eyes, and their processors don't hold a candle to our own brains. In the interest of not rambling, let's look back at early black and white cameras. When people looked at those photos, did they assume the world was black and white? Or did they acknowledge this as a characteristic of the camera? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sure, but smartphones now automatically doctor every photo you take. Someone who took the photo could not even know it was doctored and think it represents truth. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Decoy321@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Fair point, but I still think we're exaggerating the amount of doctoring that's being done by the phones. There's always been some level of discrepancy between real life subjects and the images taken of them. It's just a tool creating media from sensor data. Those sensors aren't the same as our eyes, and their processors don't hold a candle to our own brains. In the interest of not rambling, let's look back at early black and white cameras. When people looked at those photos, did they assume the world was black and white? Or did they acknowledge this as a characteristic of the camera? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Decoy321@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Fair point, but I still think we're exaggerating the amount of doctoring that's being done by the phones. There's always been some level of discrepancy between real life subjects and the images taken of them. It's just a tool creating media from sensor data. Those sensors aren't the same as our eyes, and their processors don't hold a candle to our own brains. In the interest of not rambling, let's look back at early black and white cameras. When people looked at those photos, did they assume the world was black and white? Or did they acknowledge this as a characteristic of the camera? permalink fedilink source parent