▲ 114 ▼ You SHOULD connect to Tor via a VPN, actually (yewtu.be) submitted 2 years ago by freddy@lemmy.one [M] to c/privacyguides@lemmy.one 41 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 22 points 2 years ago (2 children) It's kind of weird to comment on a video saying you're not going to watch the video but hey fair enough. Just for you here is the video transcript https://pastebin.com/ijpuwQZ7 Apologies for the link, it was too large to fit in a post permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 child) Hey thanks for the text link but I can't read all that! Is there an audio link to this transcript being read by the stolen AI likeness of Stephen Fry? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago I don't have the attention span. Could someone link a TikTok? permalink fedilink source parent [–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) This is a lemmy post, with a link to a video. The comment is not on any video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) You're correct. Let me amend my previous post. It's weird to reply to a Lemmy post about a video, saying you're not going to watch the video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) Is it? Its a pretty common forum comment, saying that they have no interest or capability to watch or listen to a video, and would rather the info was written down so they could read it. This is a normal request from digg, from reddit, here on lemmy, all over niche hobby forums.... Text based website users usually want text based content. Not really weird. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Our experiences differ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) You tend to find text based site users wish they werent? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) If people click on a video link, the discussion is typically about the video. Coming into the discussion about the video saying you're refusing to watch the video is not productive in my mind. People who want to engage in the content of the video typically wish to have a productive conversation. For people who wish to be text only, I respect that, and I understand that, that's why I provided the previous parent a link to the transcript that is also available on the YouTube video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) But, again, not a video? You click on the post link, which opens the post and comments. The title says nothing about video either. I didnt know it was a video until after opening the post. People who are using a text site, who want to engage with your posts title's implied topic of discussion, are just a bit expecting the text site to have more text to read. Kinda hard to engage with a video you cant watch, when the post implied a topic of discussion you wanted to read about, no? I dunno man youre just acting real shocked and surprised that the people at the chinese restaurant expected noodles and rice, and are giving you side eyes for offering them street tacos. Im not saying the tacos arent good tacos. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 6 points 2 years ago I see the issue, I'm using the Voyager app, it's very clear it's a video before I open the post. I guess if different apps don't make that clear, there would be a point of contention. Fair enough thank you for bringing that up I provided a link to the transcript of the video, you can engage with that textually and join the discussion. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 child) Hey thanks for the text link but I can't read all that! Is there an audio link to this transcript being read by the stolen AI likeness of Stephen Fry? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago I don't have the attention span. Could someone link a TikTok? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago I don't have the attention span. Could someone link a TikTok? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) This is a lemmy post, with a link to a video. The comment is not on any video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) You're correct. Let me amend my previous post. It's weird to reply to a Lemmy post about a video, saying you're not going to watch the video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) Is it? Its a pretty common forum comment, saying that they have no interest or capability to watch or listen to a video, and would rather the info was written down so they could read it. This is a normal request from digg, from reddit, here on lemmy, all over niche hobby forums.... Text based website users usually want text based content. Not really weird. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Our experiences differ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) You tend to find text based site users wish they werent? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) If people click on a video link, the discussion is typically about the video. Coming into the discussion about the video saying you're refusing to watch the video is not productive in my mind. People who want to engage in the content of the video typically wish to have a productive conversation. For people who wish to be text only, I respect that, and I understand that, that's why I provided the previous parent a link to the transcript that is also available on the YouTube video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) But, again, not a video? You click on the post link, which opens the post and comments. The title says nothing about video either. I didnt know it was a video until after opening the post. People who are using a text site, who want to engage with your posts title's implied topic of discussion, are just a bit expecting the text site to have more text to read. Kinda hard to engage with a video you cant watch, when the post implied a topic of discussion you wanted to read about, no? I dunno man youre just acting real shocked and surprised that the people at the chinese restaurant expected noodles and rice, and are giving you side eyes for offering them street tacos. Im not saying the tacos arent good tacos. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 6 points 2 years ago I see the issue, I'm using the Voyager app, it's very clear it's a video before I open the post. I guess if different apps don't make that clear, there would be a point of contention. Fair enough thank you for bringing that up I provided a link to the transcript of the video, you can engage with that textually and join the discussion. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) You're correct. Let me amend my previous post. It's weird to reply to a Lemmy post about a video, saying you're not going to watch the video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) Is it? Its a pretty common forum comment, saying that they have no interest or capability to watch or listen to a video, and would rather the info was written down so they could read it. This is a normal request from digg, from reddit, here on lemmy, all over niche hobby forums.... Text based website users usually want text based content. Not really weird. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Our experiences differ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) You tend to find text based site users wish they werent? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) If people click on a video link, the discussion is typically about the video. Coming into the discussion about the video saying you're refusing to watch the video is not productive in my mind. People who want to engage in the content of the video typically wish to have a productive conversation. For people who wish to be text only, I respect that, and I understand that, that's why I provided the previous parent a link to the transcript that is also available on the YouTube video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) But, again, not a video? You click on the post link, which opens the post and comments. The title says nothing about video either. I didnt know it was a video until after opening the post. People who are using a text site, who want to engage with your posts title's implied topic of discussion, are just a bit expecting the text site to have more text to read. Kinda hard to engage with a video you cant watch, when the post implied a topic of discussion you wanted to read about, no? I dunno man youre just acting real shocked and surprised that the people at the chinese restaurant expected noodles and rice, and are giving you side eyes for offering them street tacos. Im not saying the tacos arent good tacos. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 6 points 2 years ago I see the issue, I'm using the Voyager app, it's very clear it's a video before I open the post. I guess if different apps don't make that clear, there would be a point of contention. Fair enough thank you for bringing that up I provided a link to the transcript of the video, you can engage with that textually and join the discussion. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) Is it? Its a pretty common forum comment, saying that they have no interest or capability to watch or listen to a video, and would rather the info was written down so they could read it. This is a normal request from digg, from reddit, here on lemmy, all over niche hobby forums.... Text based website users usually want text based content. Not really weird. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Our experiences differ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) You tend to find text based site users wish they werent? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) If people click on a video link, the discussion is typically about the video. Coming into the discussion about the video saying you're refusing to watch the video is not productive in my mind. People who want to engage in the content of the video typically wish to have a productive conversation. For people who wish to be text only, I respect that, and I understand that, that's why I provided the previous parent a link to the transcript that is also available on the YouTube video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) But, again, not a video? You click on the post link, which opens the post and comments. The title says nothing about video either. I didnt know it was a video until after opening the post. People who are using a text site, who want to engage with your posts title's implied topic of discussion, are just a bit expecting the text site to have more text to read. Kinda hard to engage with a video you cant watch, when the post implied a topic of discussion you wanted to read about, no? I dunno man youre just acting real shocked and surprised that the people at the chinese restaurant expected noodles and rice, and are giving you side eyes for offering them street tacos. Im not saying the tacos arent good tacos. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 6 points 2 years ago I see the issue, I'm using the Voyager app, it's very clear it's a video before I open the post. I guess if different apps don't make that clear, there would be a point of contention. Fair enough thank you for bringing that up I provided a link to the transcript of the video, you can engage with that textually and join the discussion. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Our experiences differ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) You tend to find text based site users wish they werent? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) If people click on a video link, the discussion is typically about the video. Coming into the discussion about the video saying you're refusing to watch the video is not productive in my mind. People who want to engage in the content of the video typically wish to have a productive conversation. For people who wish to be text only, I respect that, and I understand that, that's why I provided the previous parent a link to the transcript that is also available on the YouTube video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) But, again, not a video? You click on the post link, which opens the post and comments. The title says nothing about video either. I didnt know it was a video until after opening the post. People who are using a text site, who want to engage with your posts title's implied topic of discussion, are just a bit expecting the text site to have more text to read. Kinda hard to engage with a video you cant watch, when the post implied a topic of discussion you wanted to read about, no? I dunno man youre just acting real shocked and surprised that the people at the chinese restaurant expected noodles and rice, and are giving you side eyes for offering them street tacos. Im not saying the tacos arent good tacos. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 6 points 2 years ago I see the issue, I'm using the Voyager app, it's very clear it's a video before I open the post. I guess if different apps don't make that clear, there would be a point of contention. Fair enough thank you for bringing that up I provided a link to the transcript of the video, you can engage with that textually and join the discussion. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) You tend to find text based site users wish they werent? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) If people click on a video link, the discussion is typically about the video. Coming into the discussion about the video saying you're refusing to watch the video is not productive in my mind. People who want to engage in the content of the video typically wish to have a productive conversation. For people who wish to be text only, I respect that, and I understand that, that's why I provided the previous parent a link to the transcript that is also available on the YouTube video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) But, again, not a video? You click on the post link, which opens the post and comments. The title says nothing about video either. I didnt know it was a video until after opening the post. People who are using a text site, who want to engage with your posts title's implied topic of discussion, are just a bit expecting the text site to have more text to read. Kinda hard to engage with a video you cant watch, when the post implied a topic of discussion you wanted to read about, no? I dunno man youre just acting real shocked and surprised that the people at the chinese restaurant expected noodles and rice, and are giving you side eyes for offering them street tacos. Im not saying the tacos arent good tacos. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 6 points 2 years ago I see the issue, I'm using the Voyager app, it's very clear it's a video before I open the post. I guess if different apps don't make that clear, there would be a point of contention. Fair enough thank you for bringing that up I provided a link to the transcript of the video, you can engage with that textually and join the discussion. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) If people click on a video link, the discussion is typically about the video. Coming into the discussion about the video saying you're refusing to watch the video is not productive in my mind. People who want to engage in the content of the video typically wish to have a productive conversation. For people who wish to be text only, I respect that, and I understand that, that's why I provided the previous parent a link to the transcript that is also available on the YouTube video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) But, again, not a video? You click on the post link, which opens the post and comments. The title says nothing about video either. I didnt know it was a video until after opening the post. People who are using a text site, who want to engage with your posts title's implied topic of discussion, are just a bit expecting the text site to have more text to read. Kinda hard to engage with a video you cant watch, when the post implied a topic of discussion you wanted to read about, no? I dunno man youre just acting real shocked and surprised that the people at the chinese restaurant expected noodles and rice, and are giving you side eyes for offering them street tacos. Im not saying the tacos arent good tacos. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 6 points 2 years ago I see the issue, I'm using the Voyager app, it's very clear it's a video before I open the post. I guess if different apps don't make that clear, there would be a point of contention. Fair enough thank you for bringing that up I provided a link to the transcript of the video, you can engage with that textually and join the discussion. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) But, again, not a video? You click on the post link, which opens the post and comments. The title says nothing about video either. I didnt know it was a video until after opening the post. People who are using a text site, who want to engage with your posts title's implied topic of discussion, are just a bit expecting the text site to have more text to read. Kinda hard to engage with a video you cant watch, when the post implied a topic of discussion you wanted to read about, no? I dunno man youre just acting real shocked and surprised that the people at the chinese restaurant expected noodles and rice, and are giving you side eyes for offering them street tacos. Im not saying the tacos arent good tacos. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 6 points 2 years ago I see the issue, I'm using the Voyager app, it's very clear it's a video before I open the post. I guess if different apps don't make that clear, there would be a point of contention. Fair enough thank you for bringing that up I provided a link to the transcript of the video, you can engage with that textually and join the discussion. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 6 points 2 years ago I see the issue, I'm using the Voyager app, it's very clear it's a video before I open the post. I guess if different apps don't make that clear, there would be a point of contention. Fair enough thank you for bringing that up I provided a link to the transcript of the video, you can engage with that textually and join the discussion. permalink fedilink source parent