▲ 456 ▼ Answer her, Daphne (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by PugJesus@lemmy.world to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world 32 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Kethal@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) None of this makes the picture above wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) What's Daphne's response supposed to be? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kethal@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I'm sorry. I see you're point. She should be saying "secede because the federal government won't enforce slavery." Very different, and the picture above is totally wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) No worries, I could have been clearer and more direct, and there are enough people who want to defend the Confederacy on the internet that it's a reflexive action to argue with anyone who seems to be pushing "alternative history." So I can't really blame you for questioning me. Stay vigilant, bigots don't fight fair. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Deuces@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Dude, I was just following this whole argument being like, he hasn't said anything wrong... Yet.... Thanks for not being a bigot! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I get that. This is a subject where typically, anyone trying to discuss the "nuance" is really just an apologist trying to veil their bigotry. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) What's Daphne's response supposed to be? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kethal@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I'm sorry. I see you're point. She should be saying "secede because the federal government won't enforce slavery." Very different, and the picture above is totally wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) No worries, I could have been clearer and more direct, and there are enough people who want to defend the Confederacy on the internet that it's a reflexive action to argue with anyone who seems to be pushing "alternative history." So I can't really blame you for questioning me. Stay vigilant, bigots don't fight fair. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Deuces@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Dude, I was just following this whole argument being like, he hasn't said anything wrong... Yet.... Thanks for not being a bigot! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I get that. This is a subject where typically, anyone trying to discuss the "nuance" is really just an apologist trying to veil their bigotry. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kethal@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I'm sorry. I see you're point. She should be saying "secede because the federal government won't enforce slavery." Very different, and the picture above is totally wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) No worries, I could have been clearer and more direct, and there are enough people who want to defend the Confederacy on the internet that it's a reflexive action to argue with anyone who seems to be pushing "alternative history." So I can't really blame you for questioning me. Stay vigilant, bigots don't fight fair. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Deuces@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Dude, I was just following this whole argument being like, he hasn't said anything wrong... Yet.... Thanks for not being a bigot! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I get that. This is a subject where typically, anyone trying to discuss the "nuance" is really just an apologist trying to veil their bigotry. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) No worries, I could have been clearer and more direct, and there are enough people who want to defend the Confederacy on the internet that it's a reflexive action to argue with anyone who seems to be pushing "alternative history." So I can't really blame you for questioning me. Stay vigilant, bigots don't fight fair. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Deuces@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Dude, I was just following this whole argument being like, he hasn't said anything wrong... Yet.... Thanks for not being a bigot! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I get that. This is a subject where typically, anyone trying to discuss the "nuance" is really just an apologist trying to veil their bigotry. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Deuces@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Dude, I was just following this whole argument being like, he hasn't said anything wrong... Yet.... Thanks for not being a bigot! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I get that. This is a subject where typically, anyone trying to discuss the "nuance" is really just an apologist trying to veil their bigotry. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I get that. This is a subject where typically, anyone trying to discuss the "nuance" is really just an apologist trying to veil their bigotry. permalink fedilink source parent
