▲ 609 ▼ ethinically ambigaus (feddit.de) submitted 2 years ago by sexy_peach@feddit.de to c/technology@lemmy.ml 64 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Primarily0617@kbin.social 44 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) but that is not a fix congratulations you stumbled upon the reason this is a bad idea all by yourself all it took was a bit of actually-reading-the-original-post permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] 520@kbin.social -20 points 2 years ago (2 children) ? My position was always that this is a bad idea. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Primarily0617@kbin.social 41 points 2 years ago* the point of the original post is that artificially fixing a bias in training data post-training is a bad idea because it ends up in weird scenarios like this one your comment is saying that the original post is dumb and betrays a lack of knowledge because artificially fixing a bias in training data post-training would obviously only result in weird scenarios like this one i don't know what your aim is here permalink fedilink source parent [–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 14 points 2 years ago* You started your initial rant based on a misunderstanding of what was actually said. Stumbling into the correct answer != knowing what you’re reacting to permalink fedilink source parent
[+] 520@kbin.social -20 points 2 years ago (2 children) ? My position was always that this is a bad idea. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Primarily0617@kbin.social 41 points 2 years ago* the point of the original post is that artificially fixing a bias in training data post-training is a bad idea because it ends up in weird scenarios like this one your comment is saying that the original post is dumb and betrays a lack of knowledge because artificially fixing a bias in training data post-training would obviously only result in weird scenarios like this one i don't know what your aim is here permalink fedilink source parent [–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 14 points 2 years ago* You started your initial rant based on a misunderstanding of what was actually said. Stumbling into the correct answer != knowing what you’re reacting to permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Primarily0617@kbin.social 41 points 2 years ago* the point of the original post is that artificially fixing a bias in training data post-training is a bad idea because it ends up in weird scenarios like this one your comment is saying that the original post is dumb and betrays a lack of knowledge because artificially fixing a bias in training data post-training would obviously only result in weird scenarios like this one i don't know what your aim is here permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 14 points 2 years ago* You started your initial rant based on a misunderstanding of what was actually said. Stumbling into the correct answer != knowing what you’re reacting to permalink fedilink source parent
