you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  1. No.

  2. "Tomfoolery"? Step away from the idiot box, gramps.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Sure granny, go believe them,I'm sure those 2 trillion arnt in some loss leading 1% government bonds

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Have you not been paying attention to what the Fed has been doing? Pardon my language but shoving cash up my asshole earns more than 1% these days.

    In 2022, before most of the rate hikes, the trust fund earned $66.4 billion. This year's high, and hopefully very temporary, interest rates aside, it'll usually be around 2.5-3%.

    I'm not sure what you think loss leading means or why you're using it here, but governments storing reserve money earmarked for a specific purpose in their own bonds isn't unusual or a bad thing. Should they stuff it under a mattress earning 0%? Should they risk it in the markets? Unsecured domestic bonds? Foreign bonds?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments