▲ 249 ▼ More guns = safer (fanaticus.social) submitted 2 years ago by sexeducation@fanaticus.social to c/memes@lemmy.ml 17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Starglasses@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Sigma@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago whataboutism is a common tactic for conservatives. instead of using it to condemn an action they use it to excuse it. their double standards have become so apparent that it doesn't trigger any sort of cognitive dissonance when a Democrat is condemned for doing something a Republican already did. any sane person could make the argument "aren't they both bad then?" and it will go completely unheard. permalink fedilink source parent [–] beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’d also like them to, but the strategy isn’t meant to be helpful. Idk the rhetoric term but it diffuses the orig argument & attempts to distract. responding to it is pointless 🤷♂️ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ComradePorkRoll@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago It's literally a tactic used by children when they're being reprimanded. If you ever come across an "adult" that argues that way, tell them to sit back while the adults talk. permalink fedilink source parent [–] drcabbage@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago But then how will we enjoy having debates if we all shut up and actually solve problems? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sigma@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago whataboutism is a common tactic for conservatives. instead of using it to condemn an action they use it to excuse it. their double standards have become so apparent that it doesn't trigger any sort of cognitive dissonance when a Democrat is condemned for doing something a Republican already did. any sane person could make the argument "aren't they both bad then?" and it will go completely unheard. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’d also like them to, but the strategy isn’t meant to be helpful. Idk the rhetoric term but it diffuses the orig argument & attempts to distract. responding to it is pointless 🤷♂️ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ComradePorkRoll@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago It's literally a tactic used by children when they're being reprimanded. If you ever come across an "adult" that argues that way, tell them to sit back while the adults talk. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ComradePorkRoll@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago It's literally a tactic used by children when they're being reprimanded. If you ever come across an "adult" that argues that way, tell them to sit back while the adults talk. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] drcabbage@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago But then how will we enjoy having debates if we all shut up and actually solve problems? permalink fedilink source parent