▲ 316 ▼ This is why Intimidation is a floating skill at my table (startrek.website) submitted 2 years ago by Stamets@startrek.website to c/rpgmemes@ttrpg.network 58 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] zombiecalypse@feddit.ch 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) least favourite changes the made Changes? 3e, 4e, and 5e all used it like that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bob_lemon@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) The scale is different. In 3e, that +5 charisma bonus is less noticeable compared to that +10 skill bonus, so specializing in a skill is more relevant. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zombiecalypse@feddit.ch 1 point 2 years ago Ah, that makes sense. It sounded like you were saying that 5e was the first to use Charisma for Intimidation, but bards being more intimidating than barbarians is a long standing (if questionable) DnD tradition. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bob_lemon@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) The scale is different. In 3e, that +5 charisma bonus is less noticeable compared to that +10 skill bonus, so specializing in a skill is more relevant. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zombiecalypse@feddit.ch 1 point 2 years ago Ah, that makes sense. It sounded like you were saying that 5e was the first to use Charisma for Intimidation, but bards being more intimidating than barbarians is a long standing (if questionable) DnD tradition. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zombiecalypse@feddit.ch 1 point 2 years ago Ah, that makes sense. It sounded like you were saying that 5e was the first to use Charisma for Intimidation, but bards being more intimidating than barbarians is a long standing (if questionable) DnD tradition. permalink fedilink source parent