900
Google's Web DRM is Worse than I Thought... (www.youtube.com)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
144 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This video as a text article: https://blog.nicco.love/google-drms-the-web/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 113 points 3 years ago (3 children)

Long ago, we praised Chrome for helping destroy Internet Explorer. Now it has become the same. No for-profit corporation is your friend.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 76 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Mozilla really did that with Firefox and Thunderbird to help kill IE and Outlook Express. Chrome came quite a bit later, but was instrumental in bringing about a performance reckoning, and a push for universal standards, sort of creating that movement. Really shocking now when you think of Google doing that.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    That's a bit revisionist.

    Mozilla and Thunderbird existed as decent alternatives, but they had a tiny market share of generally tech minded people, which was a much smaller subset of the population than it is now.

    Chrome and Gmail came in and completely demolished the market. They came in with a strong brand name, and a huge suite of features that worked well, and really ignited the Cloud app paradigm.

    I have mained Firefox on desktop throughout the decades. But give credit where credit is due.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 17 points 3 years ago* (2 children)

    Not rewriting history or anything. The Mozilla Foundation made those apps to directly compete with Microsoft to offer free and open-source alternatives to the built-in apps of IE and Outlook Express, and they succeeded at that.

    You're pointing out a different thing from the original comment I responded to, and Firefox+Thunderbird were in the mix years before Gmail and Chrome, and if you want to get "revisionist" about it, Mozilla had the browser and mail client as one single app prior to that in an attempt to do the same thing, which was an entire decade before Chrome was released.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    You're 100% right. For years Firefox was really the only game in town that was competitive with IE. Even Mac OS had a "IE for Mac OS" because otherwise the Internet (mostly) wouldn't work on a Mac.

    By the time Chrome was released, Google basically had to explain why they were creating their own browser given that IE, Firefox, Safari, and other browsers (WebKit was a fork of KHTML from KDE) were already available. At the time, they justified it with performance enhancements and a different process model for Chrome. There was a good case to be made and Chrome was indeed faster when it was launched.

    It's pretty obvious at this point that the only business model available for Google and most of the other big tech companies is to hoover up your data and use it for the presentation of ads. If I were a more of a conspiracy believer (or even thought that Google had some foresight), I would think that the only reason Google launched Chrome was to eventually do away with ad blockers.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    You asserted that it was really Mozilla that set up IE's downfall, and that's what my dissent is about.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers

    Mozilla/Netscape hovered around 20-30% throughout the 2000s. I.E. was the clear winner without any danger of losing its throne until Chrome came along.

    Being a steady competitor != destroy. Chrome and the Google suite is what upended the lopsided browser war.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago*

    You're arguing with me (for some reason) that what I said is false. It is not. If you want to talk about impact on MS's monopoly, you could be correct over time, but that's decades. Not what my original comment was about.

    Mozilla 100% setup the downfall of IE and OE because they made a case that it could done, and also sued Microsoft in court over the Monopoly. Chrome still was years away from showing up on the scene when this all happened.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent