▲ 1087 ▼ Spread the Load! Join other Instances! (loot.buckodr.ink) submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by xusontha@ls.buckodr.ink to c/memes@lemmy.ml 148 comments fedilink hide all child comments Yes I know they're getting DDoSed, I'm just messing around
[–] erasebegin@lemmy.world 12 points 3 years ago (2 children) I joined another instance and it closed within 2-3 weeks... permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] erasebegin@lemmy.world 13 points 3 years ago (7 children) This seems to be a serious downside to this system. Anyone who values a persistent profile is putting their precious data in the hands of some random instance that may or may not go bust in the near or (perhaps worse) distant future. I'm on lemmy.world because it's the most likely to survive permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 years ago sopuli.xyz has been around for years so it should survive permalink fedilink source parent [–] Newchair@feddit.ch 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) i think this is bring worked on, but in the meantime, you can still transfer subscribed communities with lemmy migrate permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Leer10@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) I'd love there to be a Trust on first use signed user record and a DHT of associated servers that would allow profile references to point to the most recently made user profile with the same key as the oldest one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Newchair@feddit.ch 1 point 3 years ago Yeah that would be ideal. That way if one instance is temporarily down you could still use your account. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Spliffman1@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago This seems to be a serious downside to this system. Anyone who values a persistent profile is putting their precious data in the hands of some random instance that may or may not go bust in the near or (perhaps worse) distant future. Isn't this the downside to any system reliant on remote operators? For any truly valuable data, the solutions remain the same, keep local copies, create backups, and store some backups offsite. As-is it seems like perhaps too many people rely strictly on offsite solutions as their singular data store, which is as bad practice as only having local backups, tbh. permalink fedilink source parent [–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago I hope you're donating permalink fedilink source parent [–] elfahor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 3 years ago Why would one need a persistent profile though? This isn't Mastodon, here accounts are throwaway, just like on Reddit permalink fedilink source parent [–] antik@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago You bet, LW ain't going anywhere. permalink fedilink source parent [–] mrmanager@lemmy.today 6 points 3 years ago* (1 child) I'm never closing mine as long as it has active users. Please come if it's a good location for you - western USA. Performance and uptime is really good but you will have some network latency if you are on the other side of the world. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] antik@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Mr manager 🫡 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mrmanager@lemmy.today 2 points 3 years ago :) Haha, I have had so many bad experiences with shitty managers so it's kind of a joke alias. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] erasebegin@lemmy.world 13 points 3 years ago (7 children) This seems to be a serious downside to this system. Anyone who values a persistent profile is putting their precious data in the hands of some random instance that may or may not go bust in the near or (perhaps worse) distant future. I'm on lemmy.world because it's the most likely to survive permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 years ago sopuli.xyz has been around for years so it should survive permalink fedilink source parent [–] Newchair@feddit.ch 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) i think this is bring worked on, but in the meantime, you can still transfer subscribed communities with lemmy migrate permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Leer10@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) I'd love there to be a Trust on first use signed user record and a DHT of associated servers that would allow profile references to point to the most recently made user profile with the same key as the oldest one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Newchair@feddit.ch 1 point 3 years ago Yeah that would be ideal. That way if one instance is temporarily down you could still use your account. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Spliffman1@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago This seems to be a serious downside to this system. Anyone who values a persistent profile is putting their precious data in the hands of some random instance that may or may not go bust in the near or (perhaps worse) distant future. Isn't this the downside to any system reliant on remote operators? For any truly valuable data, the solutions remain the same, keep local copies, create backups, and store some backups offsite. As-is it seems like perhaps too many people rely strictly on offsite solutions as their singular data store, which is as bad practice as only having local backups, tbh. permalink fedilink source parent [–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago I hope you're donating permalink fedilink source parent [–] elfahor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 3 years ago Why would one need a persistent profile though? This isn't Mastodon, here accounts are throwaway, just like on Reddit permalink fedilink source parent [–] antik@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago You bet, LW ain't going anywhere. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 years ago sopuli.xyz has been around for years so it should survive permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Newchair@feddit.ch 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) i think this is bring worked on, but in the meantime, you can still transfer subscribed communities with lemmy migrate permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Leer10@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) I'd love there to be a Trust on first use signed user record and a DHT of associated servers that would allow profile references to point to the most recently made user profile with the same key as the oldest one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Newchair@feddit.ch 1 point 3 years ago Yeah that would be ideal. That way if one instance is temporarily down you could still use your account. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Leer10@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) I'd love there to be a Trust on first use signed user record and a DHT of associated servers that would allow profile references to point to the most recently made user profile with the same key as the oldest one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Newchair@feddit.ch 1 point 3 years ago Yeah that would be ideal. That way if one instance is temporarily down you could still use your account. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Newchair@feddit.ch 1 point 3 years ago Yeah that would be ideal. That way if one instance is temporarily down you could still use your account. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Spliffman1@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago This seems to be a serious downside to this system. Anyone who values a persistent profile is putting their precious data in the hands of some random instance that may or may not go bust in the near or (perhaps worse) distant future. Isn't this the downside to any system reliant on remote operators? For any truly valuable data, the solutions remain the same, keep local copies, create backups, and store some backups offsite. As-is it seems like perhaps too many people rely strictly on offsite solutions as their singular data store, which is as bad practice as only having local backups, tbh. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago I hope you're donating permalink fedilink source parent
[–] elfahor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 3 years ago Why would one need a persistent profile though? This isn't Mastodon, here accounts are throwaway, just like on Reddit permalink fedilink source parent
[–] antik@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago You bet, LW ain't going anywhere. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mrmanager@lemmy.today 6 points 3 years ago* (1 child) I'm never closing mine as long as it has active users. Please come if it's a good location for you - western USA. Performance and uptime is really good but you will have some network latency if you are on the other side of the world. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] antik@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Mr manager 🫡 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mrmanager@lemmy.today 2 points 3 years ago :) Haha, I have had so many bad experiences with shitty managers so it's kind of a joke alias. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] antik@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Mr manager 🫡 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mrmanager@lemmy.today 2 points 3 years ago :) Haha, I have had so many bad experiences with shitty managers so it's kind of a joke alias. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mrmanager@lemmy.today 2 points 3 years ago :) Haha, I have had so many bad experiences with shitty managers so it's kind of a joke alias. permalink fedilink source parent