you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 22 points 2 years ago (3 children)

This is implying Jill Stein doesn’t know she is helping Republicans with her failed 3rd party run.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Girl is getting paid to help them for sure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    She had a successful career as a physician so no, you're making that up. Anyone who is saying she has money that's where it came from. You all have no evidence she's getting Russian money, it's pathetic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Sorry... are you saying that doctors all feel they're rich enough and don't ever lust for more money?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 2 years ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    My evidence of what? I asked if that's what you were saying.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Evidence that Jill Stein is taking money from Putin, it's a ridiculous claim with no evidence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Please quote me making that claim.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Your white knight ass galloped in to defend that point

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    When did I defend anything? Please quote my defense. Unless you're lying of course. Are you lying?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    she's not helping republicans.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Pulling the environmentalist voters away from Biden doesn't help his opponents?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    the greens are his opponent too. a vote for a green candidate doesn't help the republicans or the democrats.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    And who do you think might consider voting for a Green candidate? Certainly not republicans. There is significant overlap between the democracy crowd and the environmentalism crowd. Thus, a significant chunk of green voters would otherwise be democratic voters.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    then i guess the democrats better shift to capture some of them green voters if they want them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That attitude is precisely why we were stuck with Trump from 2017-2020, and why the country is much worse off now because of it.

    I voted for Gary Johnson is 2016 and let me tell you, I learned from my mistake. It seems you have yet to learn that lesson.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    ? you think the democrats should be able to enter office just because you don't like donald trump? fuck that. if they want my vote they better come and get it. i have an enumrable list.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    The fact that you keep changing the subject demonstrates that you are not interested in arguing in good faith. The correct course of action is to vote in such a way that your vote influences the outcome positively. By voting for a 3rd party candidate, you are choosing to not influence the result, which is irresponsible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I haven't changed the subject at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    You changed the subject from preventing fascism to nitpicking democrats. That's called whataboutism. You imply that you have no legitimate counter-argument by taking attention away from the point that shatters your argument. A person in the right would have no need for such evasive tactics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    you can characterize my vote any way you like. I'll characterize yours as supporting genocide.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments