▲ 1174 ▼ What more need be said about it? (lemmy.world) submitted 3 years ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world [M] to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 174 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world [S] 10 points 3 years ago (2 children) Sure. Try it. Try making a railroad without eminent domain. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) Eniment domain doesn't appear to be the problem here lmao It's more like Try making a railroad when the industry has been captured by regulations written by the big players whose purpose is to erect barriers to entry for any new railroad companies that might want to start up, and reduce costs by reducing safety. Also, you need angel investors to give you billions and anyone with the means to do that is already in bed with the big boys so they're not going to give you shit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world [S] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) Except it wasn't a new railroad company in the book. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca -3 points 3 years ago It is abundantly clear that we're not talking about the details of the book anymore. We are talking about that one passage and how it relates to our current society. permalink fedilink source parent [–] malaph@infosec.pub -3 points 3 years ago The protagonist being in a privileged position due to government seisuze of private property is certainly an excellent point. I just feel the state exercising power in the other direction, against productive ventures instead of property owners, may be a little too in vogue these days. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) Eniment domain doesn't appear to be the problem here lmao It's more like Try making a railroad when the industry has been captured by regulations written by the big players whose purpose is to erect barriers to entry for any new railroad companies that might want to start up, and reduce costs by reducing safety. Also, you need angel investors to give you billions and anyone with the means to do that is already in bed with the big boys so they're not going to give you shit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world [S] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) Except it wasn't a new railroad company in the book. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca -3 points 3 years ago It is abundantly clear that we're not talking about the details of the book anymore. We are talking about that one passage and how it relates to our current society. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world [S] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) Except it wasn't a new railroad company in the book. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca -3 points 3 years ago It is abundantly clear that we're not talking about the details of the book anymore. We are talking about that one passage and how it relates to our current society. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca -3 points 3 years ago It is abundantly clear that we're not talking about the details of the book anymore. We are talking about that one passage and how it relates to our current society. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] malaph@infosec.pub -3 points 3 years ago The protagonist being in a privileged position due to government seisuze of private property is certainly an excellent point. I just feel the state exercising power in the other direction, against productive ventures instead of property owners, may be a little too in vogue these days. permalink fedilink source parent