122
Exclusive: OpenAI investors considering suing the board after CEO's abrupt firing -sources (www.reuters.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 35 points 2 years ago (1 child)

They considered it, consulted a lawyer, and then stopped considering it, because what the board did was stupid (INCREDIBLY stupid) but it wasn't illegal.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    From what I know of the US justice system something being illegal doesn't really matter in civil court. It could probably be argued that the board didn't do what was best for the investors, which is what they exist to do. Instead they potentially cost the investors millions of dollars.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    It could probably be argued that the board didn’t do what was best for the investors, which is what they exist to do.

    Incorrect. OpenAI LLC (the traded company) does not have a board of directors. The board of directors actually belong to the parent company, simply "OpenAI", which is a nonprofit organization -- the only thing that they're beholden to is the OpenAI company charter.

    Here's a simplified breakdown:

    Board of Directors =[controls]=> OpenAI (non-profit) =[controls]=> OpenAI LLC =[employs]=> OpenAI CEO

    OpenAI LLC is obligated to act in the best financial interest of their shareholders, but OpenAI LLC does not actually have control over who sits in the CEO chair. That power goes to the non-profit "OpenAI" parent company -- a company beholden to their board, not shareholders.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •